Verbal Working Memory Load Dissociates Common Indices of the Numerical Distance Effect: Implications for the Study of Numerical Cognition

In four experiments, we explore the role that verbal WM plays in numerical comparison. Experiment 1 demonstrates that verbal WM load differentially impacts the two most common variants of numerical comparison tasks, evidenced by distinct modulation of the size of the numerical distance effect (NDE). Specifically, when comparing one Arabic digit to a standard, the size of the NDE increases as a function of increased verbal WM load; however, when comparing two simultaneously presented Arabic digits, the size of the NDE decreases (and here is eliminated) as a function of an increased verbal WM load. Experiment 2, using the same task structure but different stimuli (physical size judgments), provides support for the notion that this pattern of results is unique to tasks employing numerical stimuli. Experiment 3 demonstrates that the patterns observed in Experiment 1 are not an artifact of the stimulus pairs used. Experiment 4 provides evidence that the differing pattern of results observed between Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 are due to differences in stimuli (numerical vs. non-numerical) rather than to other differences between tasks. These results are discussed in terms of current theories of numerical comparison.

[1]  Derek Besner,et al.  A role for set in the control of automatic spatial response activation. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[2]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison , 2006, Cognition.

[3]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[4]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[5]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence , 2011, Cognition.

[7]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[8]  A Baddeley,et al.  Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning andmotivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). , 1974 .

[9]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The Psychology of Learning and Motivation , 1974 .

[10]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Challenging the reliability and validity of cognitive measures: the case of the numerical distance effect. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Mathematical cognition and working memory. , 2005 .

[14]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  H. Nuerk,et al.  Numerical development: current issues and future perspectives , 2005 .

[16]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Domain-specific and domain-general changes in children's development of number comparison. , 2008, Developmental science.

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  A. Healy,et al.  Counting backwards produces systematic errors. , 1983 .

[19]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[20]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Stimulus-response compatible orienting and the effect of an action not taken: Perception delayed is automaticity denied , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Quantity determination and the distance effect with letters, numbers, and shapes: a functional MR imaging study of number processing. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  M. Barnes,et al.  Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. , 2010 .

[25]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Stimulus Comparison Strategies and Task Demands in Successive Discrimination , 1994 .

[26]  T. Verguts,et al.  Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  M. Brysbaert Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. , 1995 .

[28]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task , 2009, Cognition.

[29]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage , 2009, Memory.

[30]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[31]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.

[32]  C. Semenza,et al.  The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory: the role of controlled search , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  The effect of mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude. , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[37]  C Iani,et al.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  M. McCloskey Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia , 1992, Cognition.

[39]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  Elementary subtraction. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Alice F Healy,et al.  Short-term memory processes in counting , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Working memory demands of exact and approximate addition , 2007 .