Integrating the SOP2 Model into the Flipped Classroom to Foster Cognitive Presence and Learning Achievements

This study explored student teachers’ cognitive presence and learning achievements by integrating the SOP Model in which self-study (S), online group discussion (O) and double-stage presentations (P) were implemented in the flipped classroom. The research was conducted at a university in Taiwan with 31 student teachers. Preand post-worksheets measuring knowledge of educational issues were administered before and after group discussion. Quantitative content analysis and behavior sequential analysis were used to evaluate cognitive presence, while a paired-samples t-test analyzed learning achievement. The results showed that the participants had the highest proportion of “Exploration,” the second largest rate of “Integration,” but rarely reached “Resolution.” The participants’ achievements were greatly enhanced using the SOP Model in terms of the scores of the preand post-worksheets. Moreover, the groups with a higher proportion of “Integration” (I) and “Resolution” (R) performed best in the post-worksheets and were also the most progressive groups. Both highand low-rated groups had significant correlations between the “I” and “R” phases, with “I”  “R” in the low-rated groups but “R”  “I” in the high-rated groups. The instructional design of the SOP Model can be a reference for future pedagogical implementations in the higher educational context.

[1]  Symeon Retalis,et al.  Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Andrew A. Tawfik,et al.  Using a Flipped Classroom Approach to Support Problem-Based Learning , 2015, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[3]  Dylan M Glatt,et al.  The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  Baki Cavlazoglu,et al.  Flipping a College Calculus Course: A Case Study , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[6]  Peter Shea,et al.  Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Sarah Schrire,et al.  Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Siu Cheung Kong,et al.  Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[10]  Katrina A. Meyer,et al.  FACE-TO-FACE VERSUS THREADED DISCUSSIONS: THE ROLE OF TIME AND HIGHER-ORDER THINKING , 2019, Online Learning.

[11]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF DESIGN FEATURES FOR INVERTED CLASSROOM SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY , 2014 .

[12]  Christopher Essex,et al.  Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education , 2001 .

[13]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Jacob Enfield,et al.  Looking at the Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model of Instruction on Undergraduate Multimedia Students at CSUN , 2013, TechTrends.

[15]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Separating the effects of knowledge construction and group collaboration in learning outcomes of web-based courses , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[16]  C. Reich Peer assessment. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[17]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Randall S. Davies,et al.  Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course , 2013 .

[19]  Zehra Akyol,et al.  Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Alexandra Pickett,et al.  Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  Philip Smith Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Hanna Salovaara,et al.  An exploration of students' strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[23]  Javier Onrubia,et al.  Work coordination and collaborative knowledge construction in a small group collaborative virtual task , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Shi-Jer Lou,et al.  A Preliminary Study on the Facebook-Based Learning Platform Integrated with Blended Learning Model and Flip Learning for Online and Classroom Learning , 2013, ICWL.

[25]  Panagiotis Zervas,et al.  ICT Competence-Based Learning Object Recommendations for Teachers , 2014, CELDA 2014.

[26]  Judy Lambert,et al.  Community of Inquiry Framework: Establishing Community in an Online Course. , 2013 .

[27]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[28]  Lasse Lipponen,et al.  Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning , 2002, CSCL.

[29]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Sheng-Yi Wu,et al.  Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Min Kyu Kim,et al.  The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[32]  Elson Szeto,et al.  Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[33]  J. D. Walker,et al.  It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[35]  S. Aisha Walker,et al.  Socratic strategies and devil's advocacy in synchronous CMC debate , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  Thérèse Laferrière,et al.  Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[37]  Catherine A. Bliss,et al.  IS THE WHOLE GREATER THAN THE SUM OF ITS PARTS? A COMPARISON OF SMALL GROUP AND WHOLE CLASS DISCUSSION BOARD ACTIVITY IN ONLINE COURSES , 2019, Online Learning.

[38]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .