The biaxial flexural strength of Optimal pressable ceramics and IPS Empress pressable ceramics were tested, compared and the micro-structures and compositions explored. The materials evaluated were Optimal shaded (Opcs) and unshaded (Opcus) ceramics and IPS Empress shaded (Ems) and unshaded (Emus) ceramics. Twenty-one disc specimens per material were prepared, heat-treated and tested. The piston on three-ball test ASTM F394-78 (1991) was used to test the specimens in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.15 mm/min. Specimens were viewed in a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction used to determine the phases present. Mean strengths (MPa +/- SD) were: Ems 120.1 +/- 20.5, Emus 135.8 +/- 16.0, Opcs 139.1 +/- 14.3 and Opcus 138.0 +/- 11.5. There was no statistically significant difference between Optimal shaded, Optimal unshaded and Empress unshaded strength values (p > 0.05). Empress shaded strength values were significantly lower than the other materials tested (p < 0.05). Weibull analysis provided m values: Ems 6.1, Emus 10.2, Opcs 12.8 and Opcus 13.9 and 1% and 5% probabilities of failure. Secondary electron imaging revealed a dense dispersal of leucite crystals in the glassy matrix of the Optimal ceramics of an average size 5.5 +/- 9.7 micron 2 for the Optimal shaded ceramic and 6.6 +/- 13.3 micron 2 for the Optimal unshaded ceramic. Leucite crystal agglomerates were evident for the Empress shaded material and a uniform distribution of fine leucite crystals (1.9 +/- 1.8 micron 2) for the Empress unshaded ceramic. Crystal and matrix microcracking were present in most of the material microstructures, together with porosity and tabular alumina platelets in the Optimal ceramics. X-ray diffraction revealed the presence of tetragonal leucite and small amounts of cubic leucite. Optimal ceramics and Empress unshaded ceramic provided higher strength and Weibull m values compared with Empress shaded ceramic. Inherent material defects were characterised and cubic leucite was identified.
[1]
R. Ibberson,et al.
Structural behavior, crystal chemistry, and phase transitions in substituted leucite: High-resolution neutron powder diffraction studies
,
1997
.
[2]
A. Putnis,et al.
Twinning in tetragonal leucite
,
1988
.
[3]
R. Bradt,et al.
Influence of Grain Size on Effects of Thermal Expansion Anisotropy in MgTi2O5
,
1973
.
[4]
A. Putnis,et al.
On the role of Al-Si ordering in the cubic-tetragonal phase transition of leucite
,
1993
.
[5]
J. Knowles,et al.
Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue properties of three all-ceramic crown systems.
,
1998,
The International journal of prosthodontics.
[6]
R. Davidge,et al.
The strength of two-phase ceramic/glass materials
,
1968
.
[7]
C. Fairhurst,et al.
The effect of glaze on porcelain strength.
,
1992,
Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[8]
E. Lynch,et al.
The transverse strength, reliability and microstructural features of four dental ceramics--Part I.
,
1997,
Journal of dentistry.
[9]
S. Rosenstiel,et al.
Effect of Cubic Leucite Stabilization on the Flexural Strength of Feldspathic Dental Porcelain
,
1996,
Journal of dental research.
[10]
A. L. Williams,et al.
Microcracks in Dental Porcelain and Their Behavior during Multiple Firing
,
1996,
Journal of dental research.
[11]
R. Rice.
Limitations of pore-stress concentrations on the mechanical properties of porous materials
,
1997
.
[12]
K J Anusavice,et al.
Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials
,
1990,
Journal of dental research.