Short-Term Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy

OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy with abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing robotic to abdominal sacrocolpopexy with placement of permanent mesh. The primary outcome was vaginal vault support on 6-week postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system examination. Secondary outcomes included blood loss, operative time, length of stay, blood transfusion, pulmonary embolus, gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract injury, ileus, bowel obstruction, postoperative fever, pneumonia, wound infection, and urinary retention. RESULTS: The analysis included 178 patients (73 robotic and 105 abdominal sacrocolpopexy). There were no differences in age, race, or body mass index. Robotic sacrocolpopexy showed slight improvement on POP-Q “C” point (–9 compared with –8, P=.008) when compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy and was associated with less blood loss (103±96 mL compared with 255±155 mL, P<.001), longer total operative time (328±55 minutes compared with 225±61 minutes, P<.001), shorter length of stay (1.3±0.8 days compared with 2.7±1.4 days, P<.001), and a higher incidence of postoperative fever (4.1% compared with 0.0%, P=.04). There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. Operative time remained significantly greater in the robotic group (P<.001), and estimated blood loss remained lower (P<.001) when controlling for possible confounders. CONCLUSION: Robotic sacrocolpopexy demonstrated similar short-term vaginal vault support compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy, with longer operative time, less blood loss, and shorter length of stay. Long-term data are needed to assess the durability of this new minimally invasive procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

[1]  L. Brubaker,et al.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  J. Colling,et al.  Epidemiology of Surgically Managed Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  L. Meyn,et al.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  I. Frank,et al.  Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[5]  Matthew T Gettman,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. , 2004, Urology.

[6]  G. Cundiff,et al.  Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Comprehensive Review , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  A. Ayav,et al.  Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  G. Scambia,et al.  The use of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse , 2005, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[9]  R Kevin Reynolds,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[10]  Jennifer M Wu,et al.  Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Pile.  Evaluating postoperative fever: a focused approach. , 2006, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[12]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP‐quantification‐based staging and outcomes , 2007, BJU international.

[13]  J. Hentz,et al.  Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  [Robotic assisted laparoscopic colposacropexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse]. , 2007, Archivos espanoles de urologia.

[15]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Prolapse surgery: an update , 2007, Current opinion in urology.

[16]  [Management of vaginal vault prolapse repair with robotically-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy]. , 2007, Annales d'urologie.

[17]  A. Ayav,et al.  Early results of one-year robotic surgery using the Da Vinci system to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures , 2004, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[18]  D. Elliott,et al.  Traitement du prolapsus du dôme vaginal par sacrocolpopexie laparoscopique assistée par robot , 2007 .

[19]  G. Schaer,et al.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome—a prospective study with 101 cases , 2008, International Urogynecology Journal.