New trends in parallel electromagnetic fields computation

The new trends of parallel electromagnetic fields computation are presented New hardware developments are given. New developments in parallel methods are described: standard iterative and direct solving methods and domain decomposition methods. Special attention is paid to parallel computation using the JAVA language. The current status and properties of two prevailing programming environments (PVM and MPI) are finally given and compared.

[1]  Stephen D. Gedney,et al.  A parallel finite-element tearing and interconnecting algorithm for solution of the vector wave equation with PML absorbing medium , 2000 .

[2]  Paraskevas Evripidou,et al.  The PaCMAn Metacomputer: parallel computing with Java mobile agents , 2001, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[3]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  High Performance Cluster Computing , 1999 .

[4]  Martin Costabel,et al.  Symmetric Methods for the Coupling of Finite Elements and Boundary Elements (Invited contribution) , 1987 .

[5]  Maozhen Li,et al.  Wrapping MPI-based legacy codes as Java/CORBA components , 2001, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[6]  Takeshi Iwashita,et al.  Algebraic multicolor ordering for parallelized ICCG solver in finite-element analyses , 2002 .

[7]  Stephen D. Gedney,et al.  An efficient implementation of the finite‐element time‐domain algorithm on parallel computers using a finite‐element tearing and interconnecting algorithm , 1997 .

[8]  Wolfgang M. Rucker,et al.  3D transient analysis of electromechanical devices using parallel BEM coupled to FEM , 2000 .

[9]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Analysis of Multilevel Graph Partitioning , 1995, Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM SC95 Conference.

[10]  Tim Brecht,et al.  Ajents: towards an environment for parallel, distributed and mobile Java applications , 2000 .

[11]  Peter S. Pacheco.  Parallel programming with MPI , 1996 .

[12]  Takeshi Iwashita,et al.  A Fast Solver for FEM Analyses Using the , 2002 .

[13]  Juan E. Santos,et al.  Parallel finite element algorithm with domain decomposition for three-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling , 2000 .

[14]  Chi Hou Chan,et al.  Parallel electromagnetic modeling of 3D microstrip discontinuities using FEM and PML , 2001 .

[15]  Bodo Heise.  Nonlinear simulation of electromagnetic fields with domain decomposition methods on MIND parallel computers , 1995 .

[16]  Howard Jay Siegel,et al.  MCGS: A Modified Conjugate Gradient Squared Algorithm for Nonsymmetric Linear Systems , 1999, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[17]  F. Cortial-Goutaudier,et al.  Parallel solvers for electromagnetic field computations on printed circuit boards , 2000 .

[18]  Luís Moura Silva,et al.  Heterogeneous parallel computing using Java and WMPI , 2000, Concurr. Pract. Exp..

[19]  J. W. Ruge,et al.  4. Algebraic Multigrid , 1987 .

[20]  Takeshi Iwashita,et al.  Parallel processing of 3-D eddy current analysis with moving conductor using parallelized ICCG solver with renumbering process , 2000 .

[21]  Christian Vollaire,et al.  Parallel computing for electromagnetic field computation , 1998 .

[22]  Al Geist,et al.  Heterogeneous parallel and distributed computing , 1999, Parallel Comput..

[23]  M. Kuhn.  The application of coupled BE/FE formulations in technical magnetic field computations , 1998 .

[24]  Satoshi Hirano,et al.  Bayanihan: building and studying web-based volunteer computing systems using Java , 1999, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[25]  C. Farhat,et al.  A method of finite element tearing and interconnecting and its parallel solution algorithm , 1991 .

[26]  Marcelo Lobosco,et al.  Java for high‐performance network‐based computing: a survey , 2002, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..