VQE-generated Quantum Circuit Dataset for Machine Learning

Quantum machine learning has the potential to computationally outperform classical machine learning, but it is not yet clear whether it will actually be valuable for practical problems. While some artificial scenarios have shown that certain quantum machine learning techniques may be advantageous compared to their classical counterpart, it is unlikely that quantum machine learning will outclass traditional methods on popular classical datasets such as MNIST. In contrast, dealing with quantum data, such as quantum states or circuits, may be the task where we can benefit from quantum methods. Therefore, it is important to develop practically meaningful quantum datasets for which we expect quantum methods to be superior. In this paper, we propose a machine learning task that is likely to soon arise in the real world: clustering and classification of quantum circuits. We provide a dataset of quantum circuits optimized by the variational quantum eigensolver. We utilized six common types of Hamiltonians in condensed matter physics, with a range of 4 to 16 qubits, and applied ten different ans\"{a}tze with varying depths (ranging from 3 to 32) to generate a quantum circuit dataset of six distinct classes, each containing 300 samples. We show that this dataset can be easily learned using quantum methods. In particular, we demonstrate a successful classification of our dataset using real 4-qubit devices available through IBMQ. By providing a setting and an elementary dataset where quantum machine learning is expected to be beneficial, we hope to encourage and ease the advancement of the field.

[1]  Xuehai Qian,et al.  QuEst: Graph Transformer for Quantum Circuit Reliability Estimation , 2022, ArXiv.

[2]  J. Eisert,et al.  A super-polynomial quantum-classical separation for density modelling , 2022, Physical Review A.

[3]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning , 2022, Nature Computational Science.

[4]  A. Perdomo-Ortiz,et al.  Synergy Between Quantum Circuits and Tensor Networks: Short-cutting the Race to Practical Quantum Advantage , 2022, 2208.13673.

[5]  Jordan S. Cotler,et al.  Quantum advantage in learning from experiments , 2021, Science.

[6]  George H. Booth,et al.  The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices , 2021, Physics Reports.

[7]  C. Ferrie,et al.  QDataSet, quantum datasets for machine learning , 2021, Scientific Data.

[8]  A. Green,et al.  Matrix product state pre-training for quantum machine learning , 2021, Quantum Science and Technology.

[9]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  OpenQASM 3: A Broader and Deeper Quantum Assembly Language , 2021, ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing.

[10]  B. Clark,et al.  Unitary block optimization for variational quantum algorithms , 2021, 2102.08403.

[11]  Ntwali Bashige Toussaint,et al.  Generation of High-Resolution Handwritten Digits with an Ion-Trap Quantum Computer , 2020, Physical Review X.

[12]  M. Cerezo,et al.  Entangled Datasets for Quantum Machine Learning , 2021, ArXiv.

[13]  Vedran Dunjko,et al.  Parametrized Quantum Policies for Reinforcement Learning , 2021, NeurIPS.

[14]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Qulacs: a fast and versatile quantum circuit simulator for research purpose , 2020, Quantum.

[15]  H. Neven,et al.  Power of data in quantum machine learning , 2020, Nature Communications.

[16]  K. Temme,et al.  A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning , 2020, Nature Physics.

[17]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Experimental quantum kernel trick with nuclear spins in a solid , 2019, npj Quantum Information.

[18]  Yvette de Sereville,et al.  Exploring entanglement and optimization within the Hamiltonian Variational Ansatz , 2020, PRX Quantum.

[19]  Ievgeniia Oshurko Quantum Machine Learning , 2020, Quantum Computing.

[20]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  An Adaptive Optimizer for Measurement-Frugal Variational Algorithms , 2019, Quantum.

[21]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[22]  Franco Nori,et al.  Experimental kernel-based quantum machine learning in finite feature space , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Andrei Novikov,et al.  PyClustering: Data Mining Library , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[24]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Sequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[25]  T. Martínez,et al.  Quantum Computation of Electronic Transitions Using a Variational Quantum Eigensolver. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[26]  Ken M. Nakanishi,et al.  Subspace-search variational quantum eigensolver for excited states , 2018, Physical Review Research.

[27]  Kristan Temme,et al.  Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces , 2018, Nature.

[28]  Maria Schuld,et al.  Quantum Machine Learning in Feature Hilbert Spaces. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[29]  Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz,et al.  A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[30]  Lei Wang,et al.  Differentiable Learning of Quantum Circuit Born Machine , 2018, Physical Review A.

[31]  H. Neven,et al.  Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes , 2018, Nature Communications.

[32]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Quantum circuit learning , 2018, Physical Review A.

[33]  Hartmut Neven,et al.  Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors , 2018, 1802.06002.

[34]  Vedran Dunjko,et al.  Exponential improvements for quantum-accessible reinforcement learning , 2017, 1710.11160.

[35]  Roland Vollgraf,et al.  Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms , 2017, ArXiv.

[36]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , 2017, Nature.

[37]  M. Hastings,et al.  Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms , 2015, 1507.08969.

[38]  M. Cugmas,et al.  On comparing partitions , 2015 .

[39]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor , 2013, Nature Communications.

[40]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[41]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[42]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[43]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[44]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .