Accelerated Barocycler Lysis and Extraction Sample Preparation for Clinical Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry.

We have developed a streamlined proteomic sample preparation protocol termed Accelerated Barocycler Lysis and Extraction (ABLE) that substantially reduces the time and cost of tissue sample processing. ABLE is based on pressure cycling technology (PCT) for rapid tissue solubilization and reliable, controlled proteolytic digestion. Here, a previously reported PCT based protocol was optimized using 1-4 mg biopsy punches from rat kidney. The tissue denaturant urea was substituted with a combination of sodium deoxycholate (SDC) and N-propanol. ABLE produced comparable numbers of protein identifications in half the sample preparation time, being ready for MS injection in 3 h compared with 6 h for the conventional urea based method. To validate ABLE, it was applied to a diverse range of rat tissues (kidney, lung, muscle, brain, testis), human HEK 293 cell lines, and human ovarian cancer samples, followed by SWATH-mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). There were similar numbers of quantified proteins between ABLE-SWATH and the conventional method, with greater than 70% overlap for all sample types, except muscle (58%). The ABLE protocol offers a standardized, high-throughput, efficient, and reproducible proteomic preparation method that when coupled with SWATH-MS has the potential to accelerate proteomics analysis to achieve a clinically relevant turn-around time.

[1]  P. Hains,et al.  The Impact of Commonly Used Alkylating Agents on Artifactual Peptide Modification. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Brett Larsen,et al.  Multi-laboratory assessment of reproducibility, qualitative and quantitative performance of SWATH-mass spectrometry , 2016, bioRxiv.

[4]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Reproducible Tissue Homogenization and Protein Extraction for Quantitative Proteomics Using MicroPestle-Assisted Pressure-Cycling Technology. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[5]  Edouard C. Nice,et al.  Clinical proteomics-driven precision medicine for targeted cancer therapy: current overview and future perspectives , 2016, Expert review of proteomics.

[6]  José A. Dianes,et al.  2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Minimal sample requirement for highly multiplexed protein quantification in cell lines and tissues by PCT‐SWATH mass spectrometry , 2015, Proteomics.

[8]  M. Moran,et al.  Comprehensive proteome analysis of fresh frozen and optimal cutting temperature (OCT) embedded primary non-small cell lung carcinoma by LC-MS/MS. , 2015, Methods.

[9]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Rapid mass spectrometric conversion of tissue biopsy samples into permanent quantitative digital proteome maps , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[10]  Rodrigo Torres,et al.  Peptides: A Package for Data Mining of Antimicrobial Peptides , 2015, R J..

[11]  P. Ciborowski,et al.  Pressure-assisted sample preparation for proteomic analysis. , 2013, Analytical biochemistry.

[12]  Veit Schwämmle,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of In-solution Digestion Efficiency Identifies Optimal Protocols for Unbiased Protein Analysis* , 2013, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  R. Zahedi,et al.  Protein carbamylation: In vivo modification or in vitro artefact? , 2013, Proteomics.

[14]  Bradford S Powell,et al.  Pressure cycling technology in systems biology. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[15]  L. Reubsaet,et al.  Critical assessment of accelerating trypsination methods. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[16]  A. Ivanov,et al.  Proteomics under pressure: development of essential sample preparation techniques in proteomics using ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  Darryl B. Hardie,et al.  A quantitative study of the effects of chaotropic agents, surfactants, and solvents on the digestion efficiency of human plasma proteins by trypsin. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[18]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Application of pressurized solvents for ultrafast trypsin hydrolysis in proteomics: proteomics on the fly. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  Ping Chen,et al.  Sodium-deoxycholate-assisted tryptic digestion and identification of proteolytically resistant proteins. , 2008, Analytical biochemistry.

[20]  Aaron A. Klammer,et al.  Effects of modified digestion schemes on the identification of proteins from complex mixtures. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[21]  J. Capelo,et al.  Ultra fast trypsin digestion of proteins by high intensity focused ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.