MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths

A systematic evaluation of the potential quality of magnetic resonance images recorded in the presence of metallic stents was performed on a low‐field open imager operating at 0.2 T and on a high‐field closed unit operating at 1.0 T. Eight different stent types were examined by two‐dimensional gradient‐echo sequences with echo times of 4 and 10 msec and by a fast spin‐echo technique. In addition, a three‐dimensional gradient‐echo sequence was applied with an echo time of 2.4 msec. A set of sequence and slice parameters was used on both scanners. Thus, artifacts due to susceptibility effects depending on the magnetic field strength could be distinguished from radiofrequency shielding effects in the lumen of the stents (independent of the field strength). Nine different orthogonal orientations of the stent axis and the image (in terms of slice, read, and phase‐encoding direction) were tested, and the artifacts (extension of signal void and visibility of the lumen) were compared. The optimal strategy for visualization of vascular and perivascular regions outside the stents was fast spin‐echo imaging with the stent axis and read direction parallel to the static field. Susceptibility‐induced signal void in gradient‐echo images was minimal using the three‐dimensional approach. Increased transmitter amplitudes above usual values provided clearly improved insight in the lumen using gradient‐echo sequences. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:606–615. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  W G Bradley,et al.  MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils. , 1988, Radiology.

[2]  R. Günther,et al.  Aortic and iliac stenoses: follow-up results of stent placement after insufficient balloon angioplasty in 118 cases. , 1996, Radiology.

[3]  S. Landas,et al.  Nitinol intravascular stent: results of preclinical evaluation. , 1993, Radiology.

[4]  M Heller,et al.  Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: contrast-enhanced MR angiography for preinterventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement. , 1999, Radiology.

[5]  J. Tsuruda,et al.  Low-artifact intravascular devices: MR imaging evaluation. , 1988, Radiology.

[6]  L. Johansson,et al.  Correlation between dose rate and T1 in blood at gd-enhanced MR angiography , 1998, Acta radiologica.

[7]  M. Leon,et al.  Contemporary stent designs: technical considerations, complications, role of intravascular ultrasound, and anticoagulation therapy. , 1996, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[8]  H H Quick,et al.  Vascular stents as RF antennas for intravascular MR guidance and imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  C. Claussen,et al.  Covered stents for prevention of restenosis. Experimental and clinical results with different stent designs. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[10]  P. Serruys,et al.  New stent technologies. , 1996, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[11]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  M A Moerland,et al.  Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Coronary artery stenting: indications and cost implications. , 1996, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[14]  L. E. Staxrud,et al.  Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Norway: the first 100 patients. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[15]  H H Quick,et al.  Plain and covered stent-grafts: in vitro evaluation of characteristics at three-dimensional MR angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[16]  E P Strecker,et al.  Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging of vascular stents. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  R. Lutz,et al.  Comparison of mechanical deformation properties of metallic stents with use of stress-strain analysis. , 1994, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[18]  Frank G. Shellock,et al.  Magnetic Resonance: Bioeffects, Safety and Patient Management , 1994 .