Dynamic line rating forecasting

Abstract Thermal line constraints represent a cost source for power system actors, by reducing network reliability, limiting the potential renewable energy source penetration and increasing the electricity prices. They are usually faced with network reinforcements but due to their financial and administrative complexity, new solutions such as Dynamic Line Rating are being investigated. This solution is based on the fact that the real current carrying capacity of overhead lines depends on variable weather parameters. Furthermore its real time value is very often far higher than then static conservative value commonly used. The dependence of Dynamic Line Ratings on weather implies that this parameter can be forecasted, as it is done for weather dependent renewable energy production. These forecasts can be used to improve generators' dispatch, reducing overall electricity generation cost and increasing system's reliability. Three main difference are to be noticed between the renewable energy sources production forecasts and the DLR forecasts: 1) the DLR forecasts depend on several weather parameters, implying the use of a higher number of features than with PV or wind power forecast; 2) the forecasts are to be made for several points, and not a single one, due to the fact that a critical section is to be selected along the line; 3) for safety reasons, the forecasts are to be inferior to the observations most of the time, and so probabilistic forecasts are to be developed in order to provide low quantile forecasts.

[1]  Andrea Michiorri,et al.  Forecasting real-time ratings for electricity distribution networks using weather forecast data , 2009 .

[2]  J. N. Ross,et al.  Distributed optical fibre Raman temperature sensor using a semiconductor light source and detector , 1985 .

[3]  Pawel Pytlak,et al.  Precipitation-based conductor cooling model for Dynamic Thermal Rating systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE Electrical Power & Energy Conference (EPEC).

[4]  Christophe Gaudin,et al.  Analysis of the options to reduce the integration costs of renewable generation in the distribution networks. Part 1: Impact of PV development in France and global analysis of considered alternatives to reinforcement , 2013 .

[5]  Jin-O Kim,et al.  Prediction of Dynamic Line Rating Based on Assessment Risk by Time Series Weather Model , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[6]  S. P. Basu,et al.  Design, installation, and field experience with an overhead transmission dynamic line rating system , 1996, Proceedings of 1996 Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.

[7]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Probabilistic N−1 security assessment incorporating dynamic line ratings , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[8]  Andrea Michiorri,et al.  Overhead line real-time rating estimation algorithm: Description and validation , 2010 .

[9]  David M. Greenwood,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Real-Time Thermal Ratings on Power Network Reliability , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  D. A. Douglass,et al.  Weather-dependent versus static thermal line ratings (power overhead lines) , 1988 .

[11]  Pawel Pytlak,et al.  Modelling precipitation cooling of overhead conductors , 2011 .

[12]  Jean-Louis Lilien,et al.  Operational experience with Dynamic Line Rating forecast-based solutions to increase usable network transfer capacity , 2014 .

[13]  Sanna Uski Estimation method for dynamic line rating potential and economic benefits , 2015 .

[14]  Dilan Jayaweera,et al.  Optimal scheduling with dynamic line ratings and intermittent wind power , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[15]  D. John Morrow,et al.  Impact of Dynamic Line Rating on Power Systems , 2011 .

[16]  Jana Heckenbergerova,et al.  Electric power system cost/loss optimization using Dynamic Thermal Rating and linear programming , 2010, 2010 IEEE Electrical Power & Energy Conference.

[17]  G. Olguin,et al.  Identification of Critical Spans for Monitoring Systems in Dynamic Thermal Rating , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[18]  Sanna Uski Dynamic line rating forecastability for conservative day-ahead line rating values , 2015, IECON 2015 - 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[19]  J. Mutale,et al.  Dynamic thermal rating application to facilitate wind energy integration , 2011, 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech.

[20]  Gehao Sheng,et al.  Risk assessment of transmission dynamic line rating based on Monte Carlo , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power Engineering and Automation Conference.

[21]  A. K. Deb,et al.  Prediction of overhead transmission line ampacity by stochastic and deterministic models , 1988 .

[22]  S. D. Foss,et al.  Dynamic line rating in the operating environment , 1990 .

[23]  Jana Heckenbergerova,et al.  Assessment of seasonal static thermal ratings of overhead transmission conductors , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[24]  Albert Moser,et al.  Probabilistic ampacity forecasting for overhead lines using weather forecast ensembles , 2013 .

[25]  James D. McCalley,et al.  A Bayesian approach for short-term transmission line thermal overload risk assessment , 2002 .

[26]  Peter B. Luh,et al.  Probabilistic forecasting of dynamic line rating for over-head transmission lines , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.