Reducing long term sickness absence by an activating intervention in adjustment disorders: a cluster randomised controlled design

Aims: To compare an innovative activating intervention with “care as usual” (control group) for the guidance of employees on sickness leave because of an adjustment disorder. It was hypothesised that the intervention would be more effective than care as usual in lowering the intensity of symptoms, increasing psychological resources, and decreasing sickness leave duration. Methods: A prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out with 192 patients on first sickness leave for an adjustment disorder. Symptom intensity, sickness duration, and return to work rates were measured at 3 months and 12 months. Analyses were performed on an intention to treat basis. Results: At 3 months, significantly more patients in the intervention group had returned to work compared with the control group. At 12 months all patients had returned to work, but sickness leave was shorter in the intervention group than in the control group. The recurrence rate was lower in the intervention group. There were no differences between the two study groups with regard to the decrease of symptoms. At baseline, symptom intensity was higher in the patients than in a normal reference population, but decreased over time in a similar manner in both groups to approximately normal levels. Conclusion: The experimental intervention for adjustment disorders was successful in shortening sick leave duration, mainly by decreasing long term absenteeism.

[1]  Donald Meichenbaum,et al.  Stress reduction and prevention , 1989 .

[2]  J. I.  The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[3]  R. Blonk,et al.  The benefits of interventions for work-related stress. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[4]  Risto Lehtonen,et al.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2005 .

[5]  W. Katon,et al.  Depression, anxiety, and social disability show synchrony of change in primary care patients. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[6]  E Salas,et al.  The effect of stress inoculation training on anxiety and performance. , 1996, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[7]  L. Pearlin,et al.  The structure of coping. , 1978, Journal of health and social behavior.

[8]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Mobility, Strength, and Fitness After a Graded Activity Program for Patients with Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study with a Behavioral Therapy Approach , 1992, Spine.

[9]  J. Rabe-Jabłońska,et al.  [Affective disorders in the fourth edition of the classification of mental disorders prepared by the American Psychiatric Association -- diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders]. , 1993, Psychiatria polska.

[10]  L. Derogatis,et al.  Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the scl‐90: A study in construct validation , 1977 .

[11]  Stephen Williams,et al.  Managing Workplace Stress , 1996 .

[12]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[13]  R Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[14]  M. King,et al.  Randomised controlled assessment of non-directive psychotherapy versus routine general-practitioner care , 1997, The Lancet.

[15]  D. Meichenbaum.  Stress inoculation training , 1985 .

[16]  A. Scott,et al.  Edinburgh primary care depression study: treatment outcome, patient satisfaction, and cost after 16 weeks. , 1992, BMJ.

[17]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[18]  M. Cousins.  International association for the study of pain , 1989, Pain.

[19]  Sister Christine Edwards.  Managing workplace stress , 2003 .

[20]  D. Zucker.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials , 2003 .

[21]  S Rose,et al.  Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.