The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees.

This study investigated whether cochlear implant users can identify Cantonese lexical tones, which differ primarily in their F0 pattern. Seventeen early-deafened deaf children (age= 4 years, 6 months to 8 years, 11 months; postoperative period= 11-41 months) took part in the study. Sixteen children were fitted with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system; one child was fitted with a Nucleus 22 implant. Participants completed a 2AFC picture identification task in which they identified one of the six contrastive Cantonese tones produced on the monosyllabic target word /ji/. Each target stimulus represented a concrete object and was presented within a carrier phrase in sentence-medial position. Group performance was significantly above chance for three contrasts. However, the cochlear implant listeners performed much worse than a 6 1/2-year-old, moderately hearing impaired control listener who was tested on the same task. These findings suggest that this group of cochlear implant users had great difficulty in extracting the pitch information needed to accurately identify Cantonese lexical tones.

[1]  P J Blamey,et al.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  G. Aniansson.  Screening diagnosis of secretory otitis media. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[3]  F. Zeng,et al.  Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Plomp.  Pitch of complex tones. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[6]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Practical Implications of Cochlear Implants in Children , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[7]  R. Ritsma.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Can cantonese children with cochlear implants perceive lexical tones? , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[9]  G M Clark,et al.  Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patients. , 1996, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  Huang Ts,et al.  Tone perception of Mandarin-speaking postlingually deaf implantees using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Mini System. , 1995 .

[11]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H J McDermott,et al.  Perceptual Performance of Subjects with Cochlear Implants Using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP) , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[13]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Yi Xu,et al.  Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments , 1990 .

[16]  B. Moore,et al.  Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones , 1985 .

[17]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[18]  G. Clark,et al.  Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P Seligman,et al.  Architecture of the Spectra 22 speech processor. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[20]  H. Dai.  On the relative influence of individual harmonics on pitch judgment. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  S Y Liu,et al.  Tone perception of Mandarin-speaking postlingually deaf implantees using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Mini System. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[22]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Tone and Intonation in Cantonese , 1976 .

[23]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Mimicking the human ear , 1998, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[24]  Yuen-Yuen Fok Chan.  A perceptual study of tones in Cantonese , 1974 .

[25]  G M Clark,et al.  Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  L M Collins,et al.  Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  L Geurts,et al.  Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  D H Whalen,et al.  Information for Mandarin Tones in the Amplitude Contour and in Brief Segments , 1990, Phonetica.

[29]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  Integration of segmental and tonal information in speech perception: A cross‐linguistic study , 1990 .

[30]  P. Loizou.  Introduction to cochlear implants. , 1999, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[31]  A Faulkner,et al.  Effects of the salience of pitch and periodicity information on the intelligibility of four-channel vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  B. L. Cardozo,et al.  Pitch of the Residue , 1962 .

[33]  W. Parkinson,et al.  Speech perception by prelingually deaf children and postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implant. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.