Management of the interplay effect when using dynamic MLC sequences to treat moving targets.

Interplay between organ motion and leaf motion has been shown to generally have a small dosimetric impact for most clinical intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. However, it has also been shown that for some MLC sequences there can be large daily variations in the delivered dose, depending on details of patient motion or the number of fractions. This study investigates guidelines for dynamic MLC sequences that will keep daily dose variations due to the interplay between organ motion and leaf motion within 10%. Dose distributions for a range of MLC separations (0.2-5.0 cm) and displacements between adjacent MLCs (0-1.5 cm) were exported from ECLIPSE to purpose-written software, which simulated the dose distribution delivered to a moving target. Target motion parallel and perpendicular to the MLC motion was investigated for a range of amplitudes (0.5-4.0 cm), periods (1.5-10 s), and MLC speeds (0.1-3.0 cm/s) with target motions modeled as sin. Results were confirmed experimentally by measuring the dose delivered to an ion chamber array in a moving phantom for different MLC sequences. The simulation results were used to identify MLC sequences that kept dose variations within 10% compared to the dose delivered with no motion. The maximum allowable MLC speed, when target motion is parallel to the MLC motion, was found to be a simple function of target period and MLC separation. When the target motion is perpendicular to MLC motion, the maximum allowable MLC speed can be described as a function of MLC separation and the displacement of adjacent MLCs. These guidelines were successfully applied to two-dimensional motion, and a simple program was written to import MLC sequence files and evaluate whether the maximum daily dose discrepancy caused by the interplay effect will be larger than 10%. This software was experimentally evaluated, and found to conservatively predict whether a given MLC sequence could give large daily dose discrepancies.

[1]  Jun Duan,et al.  Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[2]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  An experimental investigation on intra-fractional organ motion effects in lung IMRT treatments. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  D A Jaffray,et al.  The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of dynamic intensity modulation. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  R. Mohan,et al.  Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  Jay Burmeister,et al.  Effect of respiratory motion on the delivery of breast radiotherapy using SMLC intensity modulation. , 2007, Medical physics.

[6]  S. Webb.  Motion effects in (intensity modulated) radiation therapy: a review , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Measurement of the interplay effect in lung IMRT treatment using EDR2 films , 2006, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[8]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Effects of motion on the total dose distribution. , 2004, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[10]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  Confirmation, refinement, and extension of a study in intrafraction motion interplay with sliding jaw motion. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  H Paganetti,et al.  Effects of organ motion on IMRT treatments with segments of few monitor units. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  J Debus,et al.  Influence of intra-fractional breathing movement in step-and-shoot IMRT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  P. Keall.  4-dimensional computed tomography imaging and treatment planning. , 2004, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[16]  Brenda G. Clark,et al.  A comparison of two commercial treatment‐planning systems for IMRT , 2005, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.