Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer.

AIMS Incomplete excision leads to local recurrence following breast conservation therapy (BCT). The aim of this study was to examine factors associated with cavity margin (CM) positivity and return to theatre rates. METHODS Breast conservation surgery with entire CM excision was the initial procedure in 301 patients with 303 breast cancers. Of these, 258 patients were treated successfully with breast conservation surgery and 43 patients subsequently required a mastectomy for persistent involved margins. The mean and median follow-up was 38 and 42 (range 6-78) months, respectively. RESULTS Positive CMs were found in 73 out of 303 tumours. Large tumour size (p<0.001) and tumour type (invasive lobular cancer and ductal carcinoma in-situ) (p=0.043) were significant predictors of CM positivity both by univariate and multivariate analysis. As a result of CM status in relation to initial margin (IM) status, 60 cancers treated that were IM positive but CM negative avoided return for further excision at a second operative procedure. CONCLUSION Complete CM excision should avoid the need for further re-excision surgery in most patients where initial specimen margin was positive.

[1]  B. Fisher,et al.  Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (protocol 6). Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity , 1986, Cancer.

[2]  A. Hart,et al.  Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  A. Purushotham,et al.  Influence of tumour bed assessment on local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. , 1999, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  Allan Tucker,et al.  Local Failure and Margin Status in Early‐Stage Breast Carcinoma Treated with Conservation Surgery and Radiation Therapy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[5]  E Marubini,et al.  Local recurrences and distant metastases after conservative breast cancer treatments: partly independent events. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  W. P. Reed,et al.  The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[7]  J. Jacquemier,et al.  Risk factors for breast recurrence in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with ductal cancers treated by conservation therapy , 1990, Cancer.

[8]  Catherine C. Park,et al.  The relationship between pathologic margin status and outcome after breast-conserving therapy , 1998 .

[9]  J. Kurtz.  Factors influencing the risk of local recurrence in the breast. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[10]  C. Wells,et al.  Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies. , 2001, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  C. Redmond,et al.  Significance of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after lumpectomy , 1991, The Lancet.

[12]  B. E. F. Isher,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002 .

[13]  S. Edge,et al.  Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. , 1999, Current problems in cancer.

[14]  A. Luini,et al.  Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1,973 patients. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[15]  S. Chan,et al.  Assessment of excision margins following wide local excision for breast carcinoma using specimen scrape cytology and tumour bed biopsy. , 1994, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  C. Redmond,et al.  Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1995, New England Journal of Medicine.

[17]  G. Royle,et al.  The significance of involved tumour bed biopsy following wide local excision of breast cancer. , 1998, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[18]  D. O'hanlon,et al.  Tumour bed biopsy detects the presence of multifocal disease in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for primary breast carcinoma. , 1996, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  L. Barthelmes,et al.  Effect of cavity margin shavings to ensure completeness of excision on local recurrence rates following breast conserving surgery. , 2003, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  I. Bleiweiss,et al.  Factors associated with clear biopsy margins and clear reexcision margins in breast cancer specimens from candidates for breast conservation. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[21]  Umberto Veronesi,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Peacock,et al.  Importance of margin status in outcome of breast-conserving surgery for carcinoma. , 1994, Surgery.

[23]  Mike Clarke,et al.  EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY AND SURGERY IN EARLY BREAST-CANCER - AN OVERVIEW OF THE RANDOMIZED TRIALS , 1995 .

[24]  N. Wolmark,et al.  Lumpectomy and axillary dissection for breast cancer: Surgical, pathological, and radiation considerations , 1985, World Journal of Surgery.

[25]  C. Redmond,et al.  Breast tumor recurrence following lumpectomy with and without breast irradiation: an overview of recent NSABP findings. , 1992, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[26]  C. Coleman,et al.  Premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy have a low risk of local failure. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  I. Gage,et al.  Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast‐conserving therapy , 1996 .

[28]  R. Rainsbury,et al.  Detection of residual disease following breast‐conserving surgery , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[29]  T. Powles,et al.  Local relapse in primary breast cancer patients with unexcised positive surgical margins after lumpectomy, radiotherapy and chemoendocrine therapy. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  M. Wollin,et al.  Prognostic factors for recurrence and cosmesis in 393 patients after radiation therapy for early mammary carcinoma. , 1989, Radiology.

[31]  F. Vicini,et al.  Long term results with breast‐conserving therapy for patients with early stage breast carcinoma in a community hospital setting , 1998, Cancer.

[32]  R. Arriagada,et al.  Local relapse and contralateral tumor rates in patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy (institut gustave roussy 1970–1982) , 1995, Cancer.

[33]  S. Singletary.  Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[34]  A. Purushotham,et al.  Local recurrence after breast‐conserving surgery for breast cancer , 1996, The British journal of surgery.