Shoal Choice in the Banded Killifish (Fundulus diaphanus, Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae): Effects of Predation Risk, Fish Size, Species Composition and Size of Shoals

Banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) were presented individually with a choice of shoaling with either of two stimulus shoals which differed in shoal size, species composition, and fish body size, before and after a simulated avian predator attack. When threatened, test fish preferred to shoal with the larger of two conspecific shoals, but only if members of both stimulus shoals were of the same size class as the test fish. Otherwise, they preferred to shoal with similarly sized fish irrespective of shoal size; threat of predation increased the magnitude of this preference. Furthermore, test fish preferred a shoal of similarly sized shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas) over larger killifish, when shoal sizes were identical. This indicates that body size plays a key role in shoal choice, overriding the effects of shoal size and species preference. Notwithstanding the above, shoal choice was affected by predator threat only when differences between shoal size or body size of stimulus fish were large.

[1]  J. Parrish Layering with depth in a heterospecific fish aggregation , 1989, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[2]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Species segregation during predator evasion in cyprinid fish shoals , 1986 .

[3]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Oddity and the ‘confusion effect’ in predation , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  K. Lindström,et al.  Assortative schooling in three-spined sticklebacks? , 1990 .

[5]  G. Helfman School fidelity in fishes: The yellow perch pattern , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  The influence of food competition and predation risk on size-assortative shoaling in juvenile chub (Leuciscus cephalus) , 2010 .

[7]  A. Magurran,et al.  The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defense in fish , 1990 .

[8]  Further evidence for size‐assortative schooling in sticklebacks , 1992 .

[9]  J. Godin,et al.  Risk taking in parasitized sticklebacks under threat of predation: effects of energetic need and food availability , 1988 .

[10]  G. Helfman,et al.  Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  N. G. Wolf Odd fish abandon mixed-species groups when threatened , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  C. Theodorakis Size segregation and the effects of oddity on predation risk in minnow schools , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  D L Meyer,et al.  The Mauthner-initiated startle response in teleost fish. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  C. S. Wardle,et al.  Limit of fish swimming speed , 1975, Nature.

[15]  M. Keenleyside,et al.  Some Aspects of the Schooling Behaviour of Fish , 1955 .

[16]  J. Godin,et al.  Predator avoidance and school size in a cyprinodontid fish, the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus Lesueur) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Size-segregative behaviour in minnow shoals , 1986 .