Modelling the trash blanket effect on sugarcane growth and water use

Abstract The traditional practice of burning at the pre-harvesting of sugarcane has being phased-out in Brazil, resulting in the maintenance of a crop s residue layer on soil surface, namely the Green Cane Trash Blanket (GCTB). New technologies for electricity and second-generation ethanol (2G) production from crop residues have raised the question on what would be the optimum amount of crop residue left on the field to keep the agronomic and environmental benefits of GCTB. To support informed decision making on sugarcane trash management, we updated, evaluated and applied a new version of the SAMUCA model to simulate the sugarcane growth and water use under the GCTB effect. The updated model was calibrated and parameterized for bare soil and GCTB conditions and evaluated across different Brazilian regions. Thirty-year simulations were then conducted with the updated model to quantify the effects of GCTB on sugarcane growth and water use where sugarcane is traditionally grown in Brazil. The updated version of SAMUCA model showed equal or superior performance when compared with widely-used process-based models for sugarcane. Based on our 30-year simulations, the GCTB exhibited a high probability to promote a beneficial effect on sugarcane yields in dry climates (>90%), with the potential for increasing, on average, 14 ton ha−1 of fresh cane yield in Petrolina, Brazil. Although the beneficial effect on yields were not significant in humid regions, the maintenance of 12 ton ha−1 of GCTB was associated with a high probability (>87%) in reducing the water use of sugarcane cropping system by 89 mm, on average, potentially reducing irrigation demand in the early stages of crop development while protecting crop production under dry spell events. The new version of SAMUCA model offers as a tool for decision making on mulch management in sugarcane plantations.

[1]  C. Cerri,et al.  Meeting the global demand for biofuels in 2021 through sustainable land use change policy , 2014 .

[2]  Peter J. Thorburn,et al.  Sugarcane model intercomparison: Structural differences and uncertainties under current and potential future climates , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  R MarinFábio,et al.  Sugarcane model intercomparison , 2015 .

[4]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Sugarcane land use and water resources assessment in the expansion area in Brazil , 2016 .

[5]  A. Singels,et al.  Refining the Canegro model for improved simulation of climate change impacts on sugarcane , 2018, European Journal of Agronomy.

[6]  James W. Jones,et al.  A Stochastic Method for Crop Models: Including Uncertainty in a Sugarcane Model , 2017 .

[7]  P. Sentelhas,et al.  Performance of DSSAT CSM-CANEGRO Under Operational Conditions and its Use in Determining the ‘Saving Irrigation’ Impact on Sugarcane Crop , 2015, Sugar Tech.

[8]  Vladimir B. Bajic,et al.  A process-based model to simulate changes in tiller density and light interception of sugarcane crops , 2003 .

[9]  A. Singels,et al.  The effect of crop residue layers on evapotranspiration, growth and yield of irrigated sugarcane , 2012 .

[10]  Miroslav Trnka,et al.  Comparison of CERES, WOFOST and SWAP models in simulating soil water content during growing season under different soil conditions , 2004 .

[11]  Ernest W. Tollner,et al.  Apparent thermal conductivity of mulch materials exposed to forced convection , 2000 .

[12]  N. Inman-Bamber,et al.  Modelling genetic and environmental control of biomass partitioning at plant and phytomer level of sugarcane grown in controlled environments , 2011 .

[13]  J. L. Carvalho,et al.  Straw Removal Effects on Soil Water Dynamics, Soil Temperature, and Sugarcane Yield in South-Central Brazil , 2019, BioEnergy Research.

[14]  R. Feddes,et al.  Water productivity analysis of irrigated crops in Sirsa district, India , 2006 .

[15]  P. Thorburn,et al.  Modelling nitrogen dynamics in sugarcane systems: Recent advances and applications , 2005 .

[16]  N. Inman-Bamber,et al.  Crop coefficients and water-use estimates for sugarcane based on long-term Bowen ratio energy balance measurements , 2003 .

[17]  Daniel Alves Aguiar,et al.  Remote Sensing Images in Support of Environmental Protocol: Monitoring the Sugarcane Harvest in São Paulo State, Brazil , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Sugarcane straw availability, quality, recovery and energy use: A literature review , 2013 .

[19]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module , 1999 .

[20]  R. M. Filho,et al.  Second generation ethanol in Brazil: can it compete with electricity production? , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[21]  James W. Jones,et al.  Process-based simple model for simulating sugarcane growth and production , 2014 .

[22]  J. Thomson,et al.  Sugarcane Internode Composition During Crop Development , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[23]  G. O'Leary A review of three sugarcane simulation models with respect to their prediction of sucrose yield , 2000 .

[24]  M. Schmer,et al.  Sugarcane straw removal effects on plant growth and stalk yield , 2018 .

[25]  James W. Jones,et al.  Working with Dynamic Crop Models: Methods, Tools and Examples for Agriculture and Environment , 2014 .

[26]  James W. Jones,et al.  Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change , 2013 .

[27]  Gerrit Hoogenboom,et al.  Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China , 2013 .

[28]  J. Laclau,et al.  Growth of the whole root system for a plant crop of sugarcane under rainfed and irrigated environments in Brazil , 2009 .

[29]  S. Woskie,et al.  Particulate matter produced during commercial sugarcane harvesting and processing: A respiratory health hazard? , 2017 .

[30]  James W. Jones,et al.  Modeling organic carbon and carbon-mediated soil processes in DSSAT v4.5 , 2010, Oper. Res..

[31]  G. Hoogenboom,et al.  Understanding Options for Agricultural Production , 1998, Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development.

[32]  S. Ramburan,et al.  Regional, seasonal, cultivar and crop-year effects on sugarcane responses to residue mulching , 2017 .

[33]  Gerrit Hoogenboom,et al.  Simulating water content, crop yield and nitrate-N loss under free and controlled tile drainage with subsurface irrigation using the DSSAT model , 2011 .