Contextual cueing of visual attention
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .
[2] K. Nakayama,et al. On the Functional Role of Implicit Visual Memory for the Adaptive Deployment of Attention Across Scenes , 2000 .
[3] I. Thornton,et al. Change Detection Without Awareness: Do Explicit Reports Underestimate the Representation of Change in the Visual System? , 2000 .
[4] M. Hayhoe. Vision Using Routines: A Functional Account of Vision , 2000 .
[5] S. Liversedge,et al. Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] M. Chun,et al. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[7] R. Klein,et al. Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .
[8] M. Chun,et al. Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .
[9] S. Ullman,et al. High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1999 .
[10] N. P. Bichot,et al. Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[11] Russell A. Epstein,et al. The Parahippocampal Place Area Recognition, Navigation, or Encoding? , 1999, Neuron.
[12] P. Holland,et al. Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[13] T. Bussey,et al. Perceptual–mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[14] J. Henderson,et al. Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[15] E. Murray,et al. Monkeys with rhinal cortex damage or neurotoxic hippocampal lesions are impaired on spatial scene learning and object reversals. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.
[16] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[17] Axel Cleeremans,et al. Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[18] Todd S. Horowitz,et al. Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.
[19] M. Chun,et al. Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.
[20] R. Clark,et al. Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. , 1998, Science.
[21] H. Intraub. The representation of visual scenes , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[22] L. Nadel,et al. Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[23] R. Lubow,et al. Visual search as a function of type of prior experience with target and distractor. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] T. Poggio,et al. I think I know that face... , 1996, Nature.
[25] D. Gaffan,et al. Interaction of Perirhinal Cortex with the Fornix–Fimbria: Memory for Objects and “Object-in-Place” Memory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[26] S. Ullman. High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1996 .
[27] D. E. Irwin. Integrating Information Across Saccadic Eye Movements , 1996 .
[28] Gurindar S. Sohi,et al. Memory systems , 1996, CSUR.
[29] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.
[30] Gordon D. Logan,et al. What Is Learned During Automatization? The Role of Attention in Constructing an Instance , 1994 .
[31] P Cavanagh,et al. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[32] D. Gaffan. Scene-Specific Memory for Objects: A Model of Episodic Memory Impairment in Monkeys with Fornix Transection , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[33] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[34] S. Yantis,et al. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[35] L. Squire. Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[36] P. Lewicki,et al. Nonconscious acquisition of information. , 1992, The American psychologist.
[37] M. Fanselow,et al. Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. , 1992, Science.
[38] L. Squire. Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.
[39] Y. Miyashita,et al. Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.
[40] Kevin J. Hawley,et al. Attention capture by novel stimuli. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[41] Allen Allport,et al. Visual attention , 1989 .
[42] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[43] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[44] R. Sutherland,et al. Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.
[45] G. Logan. Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .
[46] Raymond Klein,et al. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.
[47] J. Kihlstrom. The cognitive unconscious. , 1987, Science.
[48] J Miller,et al. Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[49] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. The appeal of parallel distributed processing , 1986 .
[50] R. Morris,et al. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.
[51] I. Biederman,et al. Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[52] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[53] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[54] A. Friedman. Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[55] Patrick Rabbitt,et al. Improvement, Learning and Retention of Skill at Visual Search , 1979 .
[56] P Rabbitt,et al. Modulation of Selective Attention by Sequential Effects in Visual Search Tasks , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[57] L. Nadel,et al. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .
[58] N. Mackworth,et al. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[59] Walter Schneider,et al. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .
[60] tephen E. Palmer. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.
[61] A. Baddeley,et al. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .
[62] M. Potter. Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.
[63] R. Hirsh. The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: a theory. , 1974, Behavioral biology.
[64] I. Biederman. Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.
[65] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[66] E. Gibson. Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .
[67] N. Mackworth,et al. The gaze selects informative details within pictures , 1967 .
[68] A. L. I︠A︡rbus. Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .
[69] J. Gibson. The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .
[70] E. Tulving,et al. STIMULUS INFORMATION AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION AS DETERMINANTS OF TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION OF WORDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.
[71] O. G. Selfridge,et al. Pattern recognition and modern computers , 1899, AFIPS '55 (Western).
[72] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. The Need for Attention to See Change 3 To See or Not to See : The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 2001 .
[73] J. Henderson,et al. High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.
[74] R. Morris,et al. Contingent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: Dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions , 1998, Hippocampus.
[75] S. Yantis. Control of visual attention. , 1998 .
[76] E. Murray,et al. Selective hippocampal lesions yield nonspatial memory impairments in rhesus monkeys , 1998, Hippocampus.
[77] M. Moscovitch. Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. , 1994 .
[78] Marcia K. Johnson. Binding complex memories: The role of reactivation and the hippocampus. , 1994 .
[79] A. Reber. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .
[80] H. Eichenbaum,et al. Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system , 1993 .
[81] A. Treisman,et al. Automaticity and preattentive processing. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.
[82] D. O. Hebb,et al. The organization of behavior , 1988 .
[83] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.
[84] R. Shiffrin,et al. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .
[85] Walter Schneider,et al. Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .
[86] P. H. Lindsay,et al. Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology , 1972 .
[87] D. Broadbent. Perception and communication , 1958 .