Ranging of songs with the song type on use of different cues in Carolina wrens: effects of familiarity

Abstract Male territorial song birds are usually spaced far apart and most often hear conspecific song after it has been degraded by propagation through the environment. Their ability to use the degradation of songs to assess the distance of a singing rival without approaching (called ranging) presumably increases the efficiency of defending a territory. In order to assess degradation in a song the receiver needs to compare the characteristics of the received song to its characteristics at the source or at different distances. Earlier experiments on ranging in species with song repertoires have suggested that prior familiarity with the particular song type is necessary for ranging. Here I show that male Carolina wrens (Thryothorus ludovicianus) can use either temporal or spectral characteristics for ranging song types which they were unlikely to have heard previously. Playbacks consisting of only one song prevented subjects' close-range experience with the loudspeaker, and flights beyond the loudspeaker provided direct evidence for over-assessment of distance when songs were degraded. Because ranging of songs was not affected by the degree of familiarity with the song type, this experiment provides no evidence that song repertoires hinder ranging in Carolina wrens, as suggested by Morton's ranging hypothesis. Instead, at least approximate ranging of songs is evidently possible by assessment of degradation in general features of a species' songs.

[1]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Habitat‐induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal‐to‐noise ratio in blackbird song , 1993 .

[2]  Marc Naguib Ranging By Song in Carolina Wrens Thryothorus Ludovicianus: Effects of Environmental Acoustics and Strength of Song Degradation , 1996 .

[3]  B. S. Simpson Effects of location in territory and distance from neighbours on the use of song repertoires by Carolina wrens , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Sound Cues to Distance: The Perception of Range , 1994 .

[5]  Douglas G. Richards,et al.  ESTIMATION OF DISTANCE OF SINGING CONSPECIFICS BY THE CAROLINA WREN , 1981 .

[6]  N. Mathevon DEGRADED TEMPORAL SOUND FEATURES AS A FUNCTION OF DISTANCE AND POTENTIAL AS CUES FOR RANGING IN BIRDS , 1998 .

[7]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  6 – Grading, Discreteness, Redundancy, and Motivation-Structural Rules , 1982 .

[8]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Song matching in the great tit Parus major L. , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Song transmission and auditory perception of distance in wood warblers (Parulinae) , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  A. Michelsen Sound Reception in Different Environments , 1978 .

[11]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The reaction of great tits (Parus major) to playback of degraded and undegraded songs: the effect of familiarity with the stimulus song type , 1983 .

[12]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Auditory distance estimation in song birds: Implications, methodologies and perspectives , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  Predictions From the Ranging Hypothesis for the Evolution of Long Distance Signals in Birds , 1986 .

[14]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Song matching in the great tit (Parus major): The effect of similarity and familiarity , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  On the learning of degraded and undegraded songs in the Carolina wren , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  E. Morton 14. A Comparison of Vocal Behavior among Tropical and Temperate Passerine Birds , 2020 .

[17]  P. McGregor THE SINGER AND THE SONG: ON THE RECEIVING END OF BIRD SONG , 1991 .

[18]  E. Morton,et al.  Song ranging by the dusky antbird, Cercomacra tyrannina: ranging without song learning , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Ranging of conspecific songs by Kentucky warblers and its implications for interactions of territorial males , 1996 .

[20]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[21]  B. S. Simpson Tests of habituation to song repertoires by Carolina wrens , 1984 .

[22]  Laurene M. Ratcliffe,et al.  SONG DEGRADATION AND ESTIMATION OF ACOUSTIC DISTANCE IN BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES (PARUS ATRICAPILLUS) , 1995 .

[23]  R. H. Wiley,et al.  Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Emma L. Brindley,et al.  Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Peter Marler,et al.  How Do Birds Sing , 1988 .

[26]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Auditory distance assessment of singing conspecifies in Carolina wrens: the role of reverberation and frequency-dependent attenuation , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  The response of Western Meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) to the playback of undegraded and degraded songs , 1984 .