Improving detection of coronary morphological features from digital angiograms. Effect of stenosis-stabilized display.
暂无分享,去创建一个
M P Eckstein | M. Eckstein | J. Whiting | N L Eigler | K N Mahrer | J S Whiting | N. Eigler | K. Mahrer
[1] M L Giger,et al. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 13. Effect of simple structured noise on the detectability of simulated stenotic lesions. , 1989, Medical physics.
[2] J. Douglas,et al. Morphological Predictors of Acute Complications After Percutaneous Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplast: Results of a Comprehensive Angiographic Analysis Importance of the Eccentricity Index , 1992, Circulation.
[3] M. Mooney,et al. Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.
[4] Arthur E. Burgess. On Sampling Statistics In Observer Performance Studies , 1989, Other Conferences.
[5] K. Gould,et al. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] R. F. Wagner,et al. Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.
[7] L Morgenstern,et al. Coronary angioscopy in patients with unstable angina pectoris. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.
[8] E. Topol,et al. Relation of Stenosis Morphology and Clinical Presentation to the Procedural Results of Directional Coronary Atherectomy , 1991, Circulation.
[9] Y. Uchida,et al. Angioscopic observation of the coronary luminal changes induced by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1989, American heart journal.
[10] J. Murgo,et al. Percutaneous angioscopy during coronary angioplasty using a steerable microangioscope. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] M. S. Chesters,et al. Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.
[12] Edward C. Carterette,et al. Observer performance in dynamic displays: effect of frame rate on visual signal detection in noisy images , 1991, Electronic Imaging.
[13] C E Metz,et al. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.
[14] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .
[15] E J Topol,et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.
[16] E. Topol,et al. Determinants of 2‐Year Outcome After Coronary Angioplasty in Patients With Multivessel Disease on the Basis of Comprehensive Preprocedural Evaluation: Implications for Patient Selection , 1991, Circulation.
[17] G. Legge,et al. Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[18] A. Kurita,et al. Pathological findings after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1984, British heart journal.
[19] R. F. Wagner,et al. Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.
[20] Theodore G. Birdsall,et al. Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .
[21] H. Hecht,et al. Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.