Limitations imposed by optical turbulence profile structure and evolution on tomographic reconstruction for the ELT

The performance of tomographic adaptive optics (AO) systems is intrinsically linked to the vertical profile of optical turbulence. First, a sufficient number of discrete turbulent layers must be reconstructed to model the true continuous turbulence profile. Secondly over the course of an observation, the profile as seen by the telescope changes and the tomographic reconstructor must be updated. These changes can be due to the unpredictable evolution of turbulent layers on meteorological time-scales as short as minutes. Here, we investigate the effect of changing atmospheric conditions on the quality of tomographic reconstruction by coupling fast analytical AO simulation to a large data base of 10 691 high-resolution turbulence profiles measured over two years by the Stereo-SCIDAR instrument at ESO Paranal, Chile. This work represents the first investigation of these effects with a large, statistically significant sample of turbulence profiles. The statistical nature of the study allows us to assess not only the degradation and variability in tomographic error with a set of system parameters (e.g. number of layers and temporal update period), but also the required parameters to meet some error threshold. In the most challenging conditions where the profile is rapidly changing, these parameters must be far more tightly constrained in order to meet this threshold. By providing estimates of these constraints for a wide range of system geometries as well as the impact of different temporal optimization strategies we may assist the designers of tomographic AO for the extremely large telescope to dimension their systems.

[1]  T. Fusco,et al.  The adaptive optics modes for HARMONI: from Classical to Laser Assisted Tomographic AO , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[2]  Luc Gilles,et al.  Wavefront error budget development for the Thirty Meter Telescope laser guide star adaptive optics system , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[3]  Pascal Jagourel,et al.  Adaptive optics for MOSAIC: design and performance of the wide(st)-field AO system for the E-ELT , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[4]  Prasanth H. Nair,et al.  Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , 2013, 1307.6212.

[5]  T. Fusco,et al.  Identifying optical turbulence profiles for realistic tomographic error in adaptive optics , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[6]  Richard W. Wilson,et al.  SLODAR: measuring optical turbulence altitude with a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor , 2002 .

[7]  Thierry Fusco,et al.  Impact of Cn2 profile structure on wide-field AO performance , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  Jean-Pierre Veran,et al.  Analytical model for Shack-Hartmann-based adaptive optics systems , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[9]  Tapio Helin,et al.  Comparison of methods for the reduction of reconstructed layers in atmospheric tomography. , 2017, Applied optics.

[10]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  MAORY real-time computer preliminary design , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  H. Ltaief,et al.  Scalable soft real-time supervisor for tomographic AO , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  G. Rousset,et al.  Tomography approach for multi-object adaptive optics. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  MAORY for ELT: preliminary design overview , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  J. Conan,et al.  Tomographic reconstruction for wide-field adaptive optics systems: Fourier domain analysis and fundamental limitations. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  Awad Aubad,et al.  Towards a framework building for social systems modelling , 2020 .

[16]  Olivier Martin,et al.  Temporal convergence of phase spatial covariance matrix measurements in tomographic adaptive optics , 2012, Other Conferences.

[17]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[18]  B. Ellerbroek,et al.  Split atmospheric tomography using laser and natural guide stars. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Brent L Ellerbroek,et al.  Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  J. Ascenso,et al.  Defining reference turbulence profiles for E-ELT AO performance simulations , 2013 .

[21]  F. Derie,et al.  Optical turbulence profiling with stereo-SCIDAR for VLT and ELT. , 2018, 1806.02585.

[22]  G. Rousset,et al.  Wave-front error breakdown in laser guide star multi-object adaptive optics validated on-sky by Canary , 2017 .

[23]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[24]  B L Ellerbroek,et al.  Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  Optimizing the accuracy and efficiency of optical turbulence profiling using adaptive optics telemetry for extremely large telescopes , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[26]  G. Rousset,et al.  Wave-front error breakdown in LGS MOAO validated on-sky by CANARY , 2016 .

[27]  Laurent M. Mugnier,et al.  Phase estimation for large field of view: application to multiconjugate adaptive optics , 1999, Optics + Photonics.

[28]  V. S. Dhillon,et al.  Stereo-SCIDAR: optical turbulence profiling with high sensitivity using a modified SCIDAR instrument , 2013, 1312.3465.

[29]  M J Townson,et al.  AOtools: a Python package for adaptive optics modelling and analysis. , 2019, Optics express.

[30]  Roberto Biasi,et al.  Prototyping AO RTC using emerging high performance computing technologies with the Green Flash project , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[31]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics for Astronomy , 2018, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics.

[32]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Atmospheric turbulence profiling using multiple laser star wavefront sensors , 2012 .

[33]  L M Mugnier,et al.  Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.