Utility of Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization (CISH) for Detection of EGFR Amplification in Glioblastoma: Comparison With Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)

In this study, we test the reliability of chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification in glioblastoma. Earlier reports have described EGFR CISH in glioblastoma multiforme, but a comparison of CISH with a “gold standard” testing method, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), has not been described. Therapies targeting the EGFR-signaling pathway might increase the importance of assessment of EGFR-amplification status. CISH is a potential alternative to FISH as a testing method. To test its reliability, EGFR-amplification status by CISH was assessed in 89 cases of glioblastoma and compared with FISH results, and correlated with the protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for EGFR. FISH was scored as being EGFR-amplified in 47/89 tumors, CISH as being amplified in 43/89 tumors. The CISH and FISH results were in agreement in 83/89 cases (93%). Four glioblastomas were scored as being amplified by FISH, but not by CISH; whereas amplification was detected in 2 tumors by CISH that were not amplified using FISH. Forty-eight of the 89 cases were positive for EGFR expression by IHC. EGFR amplification was highly correlated with protein expression by IHC, as 40/48 (83%) EGFR IHC-positive cases were found to be EGFR-amplified. The high concordance of CISH and FISH for the assessment of EGFR gene-amplification status indicates that CISH is a viable alternative to FISH for the detection of EGFR gene amplification in glioblastoma. Detectable EGFR expression by IHC can occur in the absence of gene amplification, but is uncommon.

[1]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Validation of chromogenic in situ hybridization for detection of EGFR copy number amplification in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma , 2007, Modern Pathology.

[2]  P. Kleihues,et al.  Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. , 2007, The American journal of pathology.

[3]  A. Sapino,et al.  Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[4]  C. James,et al.  Identification of molecular characteristics correlated with glioblastoma sensitivity to EGFR kinase inhibition through use of an intracranial xenograft test panel , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[5]  J. Isola,et al.  Amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor in astrocytic tumours by chromogenic in situ hybridization: association with clinicopathological features and patient survival , 2006, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[6]  Li Zhang,et al.  Prognostic Associations of Activated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Akt Pathways in Glioblastoma , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  K. Kwok,et al.  Chromogenic in-situ hybridization: a viable alternative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the HER2 testing algorithm , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[8]  S. Tripp,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Amplification and Protein Expression in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Prognostic Significance and Relationship to Other Prognostic Factors , 2006, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[9]  N. Sneige,et al.  Reliability of chromogenic in situ hybridization for detecting HER-2 gene status in breast cancer: comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization and assessment of interobserver reproducibility , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[10]  E. Rushing,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization accurately identifies EGFR amplification in small cell glioblastoma multiforme, a common subtype of primary GBM. , 2005, Clinical neuropathology.

[11]  S. Tripp,et al.  Relationship between EGFR overexpression and gene amplification status in central nervous system gliomas. , 2005, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[12]  N. Dandachi,et al.  Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assesment in breast cancer , 2004, Journal of Molecular Histology.

[13]  Y. Marie,et al.  Distinct Responses of Xenografted Gliomas to Different Alkylating Agents Are Related to Histology and Genetic Alterations , 2004, Cancer Research.

[14]  Jianhua Tao,et al.  Evaluation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) by Chromogenic In Situ: Hybridization (CISH™) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in Archival Gliomas Using Bright-Field Microscopy , 2004, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[15]  Adam Dicker,et al.  The contribution of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway to radioresistance in human gliomas: a review of preclinical and correlative clinical data. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Clinical Utility of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Morphologically Ambiguous Gliomas with Hybrid Oligodendroglial/Astrocytic Features , 2003, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[17]  C. James,et al.  PTEN mutation, EGFR amplification, and outcome in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  Y. Yonekawa,et al.  PTEN (MMAC1) Mutations Are Frequent in Primary Glioblastomas (de novo) but not in Secondary Glioblastomas , 1998, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[19]  P. Kleihues,et al.  Genetic alterations associated with the evolution and progression of astrocytic brain tumours , 2004, Virchows Archiv.

[20]  Cdm Fletcher,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .