Infrastructure assisted adaptive driving to stabilise heterogeneous vehicle strings

Literature has shown potentials of Connected/Cooperative Automated Vehicles (CAVs) in improving highway operations, especially on roadway capacity and flow stability. However, benefits were also shown to be negligible at low market penetration rates. This work develops a novel adaptive driving strategy for CAVs to stabilise heterogeneous vehicle strings by controlling one CAV under vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications. Assumed is a roadside system with V2I communications, which receives control parameters of the CAV in the string and estimates parameters imperfectly of non-connected automated vehicles. It determines the adaptive control parameters (e.g. desired time gap and feedback gains) of the CAV if a downstream disturbance is identified and sends them to the CAV. The CAV changes its behaviour based on the adaptive parameters commanded by the roadside system to suppress the disturbance. The proposed adaptive driving strategy is based on string stability analysis of heterogeneous vehicle strings. To this end, linearised vehicle dynamics model and control law are used in the controller parametrisation and Laplace transform of the speed and gap error dynamics in time domain to frequency domain enables the determination of sufficient string stability criteria of heterogeneous strings. The analytical string stability conditions give new insights into automated vehicular string stability properties in relation to the system properties of time delays and controller design parameters of feedback gains and desired time gap. It further allows the quantification of a stability margin, which is subsequently used to adapt the feedback control gains and desired time gap of the CAV to suppress the amplification of gap and speed errors through the string. Analytical results are verified via systematic simulation of both homogeneous and heterogeneous strings. Simulation demonstrates the predictive power of the analytical string stability conditions. The performance of the adaptive driving strategy under V2I cooperation is tested in simulation. Results show that even the estimation of control parameters of non-connected automated vehicles are imperfect and there is mismatch between the model used in analytical derivation and that in simulation, the proposed adaptive driving strategy suppresses disturbances in a wide range of situations.

[1]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[2]  Meng Wang,et al.  Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part II: Cooperative sensing and cooperative control , 2014 .

[3]  Meng Wang,et al.  Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part I: Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems , 2014 .

[4]  Meng Wang,et al.  Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control , 2015 .

[5]  Gábor Orosz,et al.  Optimal Control of Connected Vehicle Systems With Communication Delay and Driver Reaction Time , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation , 2012 .

[7]  Alireza Talebpour,et al.  Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput , 2016 .

[8]  R. E. Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms for spatio-temporal pattern formation in highway traffic models , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Christopher Nowakowski,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control , 2015 .

[10]  Feng Gao,et al.  Practical String Stability of Platoon of Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  String-Stable CACC Design and Experimental Validation: A Frequency-Domain Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[12]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance , 2008 .

[13]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Lp String Stability of Cascaded Systems: Application to Vehicle Platooning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[14]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  R. Happee,et al.  Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of adaptive cruise controlled vehicles , 2018 .

[16]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models , 2006 .

[17]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data , 2014 .

[18]  Gábor Orosz,et al.  Motif-Based Design for Connected Vehicle Systems in Presence of Heterogeneous Connectivity Structures and Time Delays , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Charles A. Desoer,et al.  Longitudinal control of a platoon of vehicles with no communication of lead vehicle information: a system level study , 1993 .

[20]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicles for improved flow stability and string stability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Romain Billot,et al.  Linear and Weakly Nonlinear Stability Analyses of Cooperative Car-Following Models , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[22]  Yury Orlov,et al.  On-line identification of SISO linear time-invariant delay systems from output measurements , 2007, Autom..

[23]  M. Treiber,et al.  Evidence of convective instability in congested traffic flow: A systematic empirical and theoretical investigation , 2011 .

[24]  Meng Wang,et al.  Cooperative Car-Following Control: Distributed Algorithm and Impact on Moving Jam Features , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[25]  Dong Ngoduy,et al.  Effect of the car-following combinations on the instability of heterogeneous traffic flow , 2015 .

[26]  Meng Wang,et al.  Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[27]  Gábor Orosz,et al.  Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback , 2014 .

[28]  Fang Zhou,et al.  Parsimonious shooting heuristic for trajectory control of connected automated traffic part I: Theoretical analysis with generalized time geography , 2015, ArXiv.

[29]  Dong Ngoduy,et al.  Platoon based cooperative driving model with consideration of realistic inter-vehicle communication , 2016 .

[30]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Modeling Effects of Driver Control Assistance Systems on Traffic , 2001 .

[31]  Meng Wang,et al.  Realistic Car-Following Models for Microscopic Simulation of Adaptive and Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles , 2017 .

[32]  Meng Wang,et al.  A cooperative system based variable speed limit control algorithm against jam waves - an extension of the SPECIALIST algorithm , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).