Conventionalised impoliteness formulae

This paper makes a contribution to the study of impoliteness. More particularly, it explores conventionalised impoliteness formulae and their basis. It taps into debates about whether impoliteness (or politeness, for that matter) can be inherent in expressions, and argues that there is a sense in which it can. An important foundation for this paper is Terkourafi's (e.g. 2001, 2002) work on formulaic politeness expressions. However, it argues that Terkourafi's strong focus on the frequency of people's direct experience of linguistic expressions in specific contexts, whilst appropriate for politeness, does not entirely suit an account of conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Indirect experience of impoliteness, especially via metadiscourse, does much to shape what counts as impolite and thus what may be conventionalised as impolite. Such impoliteness metadiscourse is driven not only by the salience of impoliteness, but by the social dynamics of impoliteness itself. Finally, this paper proposes two methods for identifying conventionalised impoliteness formulae (one being akin to Terkourafi's method), and offers a preliminary list of such formulae in English.

[1]  Miriam A. Locher.  Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements In Oral Communication , 2004 .

[2]  B. Fraser.  Perspectives on politeness , 1990 .

[3]  Jonathan Culpeper.  Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link , 2005 .

[4]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook , 1990 .

[5]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  Introduction : impoliteness and power in language , 2008 .

[6]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[7]  Dane Archer,et al.  The Encoding of Meaning: A Test of Three Theories of Social Interaction , 1980 .

[8]  M. Terkourafi.  Identity and semantic change: Aspects of T/V usage in Cyprus , 2005 .

[9]  J. Holmes.  Politeness and postmodernism – an appropriate approach to the analysis of language and gender? , 2005 .

[10]  T. V. Dijk,et al.  Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk , 1987 .

[11]  L. Lachenicht.  Aggravating language a study of abusive and insulting language , 1980 .

[12]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon , 1992 .

[13]  T. A. Dijk.  Social cognition, social power and social discourse , 1988 .

[14]  D. Blakemore.  Semantic Constraints on Relevance , 1987 .

[15]  D. Rumelhart.  Schemata and the cognitive system. , 1984 .

[16]  Michael Haugh,et al.  The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative , 2007 .

[17]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[18]  G. Kasper.  Linguistic politeness:: Current research issues☆ , 1990 .

[19]  Marina Terkourafi,et al.  Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach , 2001 .

[20]  Marina Terkourafi,et al.  Beyond the micro-level in politeness research , 2005 .

[21]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[22]  J. Bavelas,et al.  Visible Acts of Meaning , 2000 .

[23]  Gino Eelen.  A critique of politeness theories , 2001 .

[24]  E. Mertz.  Linguistic Ideology and Praxis in U.S. Law School Classrooms , 1992 .

[25]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? , 2007 .

[26]  Margaret Gilbert.  On Social Facts , 1989 .

[27]  M. Terkourafi.  Politeness and formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek , 2002 .

[28]  Charles Antaki,et al.  Social Cognition and Discourse , 1997 .

[29]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[30]  Jonathan Culpeper.  The metalanguage of IMPOLITENESS : explorations in the Oxford English Corpus. , 2009 .

[31]  H. Giles,et al.  Handbook of language and social psychology , 1992 .

[32]  O. G. Nwoye,et al.  Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face , 1992 .

[33]  Jonathan Culpeper.  Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence , 2011 .

[34]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  Politeness Theory and Relational Work , 2005 .

[35]  Robert T. Craig,et al.  The discourse of requests assessment of a politeness approach , 1986 .

[36]  B. Fraser,et al.  The association of deference with linguistic form , 1981 .

[37]  S. Mills.  Gender and impoliteness , 2005 .

[38]  Paul Baker,et al.  Contemporary Corpus Linguistics , 2009 .

[39]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .

[40]  M. Stubbs.  On inference theories and code theories: Corpus evidence for semantic schemas , 2001 .

[41]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[42]  Douglas Biber,et al.  A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: multi-word patterns in speech and writing , 2009 .

[43]  Derek Bousfield,et al.  Impoliteness in interaction , 2008 .

[44]  E. Anderson.  Beyond Homo Economicus: New Developments in Theories of Social Norms , 2000 .

[45]  S. Mills.  Gender and Politeness , 2003 .

[46]  G. Leech.  Principles of pragmatics , 1983 .

[47]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. , 1996 .

[48]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication , 2002 .

[49]  Angeliki Salamoura,et al.  Reviewing linguistic thought : converging trends for the 21st century , 2005 .

[50]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[51]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness , 2006 .

[52]  P. Strawson.  Intention and Convention in Speech Acts , 1964 .

[53]  E. Lepore,et al.  Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism , 2005 .

[54]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Book Reviews: Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English , 2000, CL.

[55]  D. Cruse,et al.  Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics , 2000 .

[56]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[57]  N. Coupland,et al.  Metalanguage : social and ideological perspectives , 2004 .

[58]  David Lewis.  Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[59]  Richard J. Watts,et al.  Relational work and impoliteness: negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour , 2008 .

[60]  P. Kuehlein,et al.  Perspectives on dialogue in the new millennium , 2003 .

[61]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. , 2003 .