A three-dimensional numerical study on the correlation of spatial structure, hydrodynamic conditions, and mass transfer and conversion in biofilms

Abstract A three-dimensional model for convection, diffusion, and reaction in a porous, heterogeneous system has been implemented. It is used to analyse the influence of hydrodynamics and structural heterogeneities on mass transfer and conversion processes of solutes in biofilm systems. The mathematical model comprises the full incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and mass transfer with nonlinear reactions in the biofilm. It is found that increased biofilm surface roughness means decreased mass conversion in the solid biofilm. Secondly, a correlation between bulk flow Reynolds number and the Sherwood number for mass transfer across the irregular liquid/solid interface is formulated. In a further study the contribution of convective transport to overall mass transfer from bulk liquid into the biofilm was analysed. The main result was that the experimental observation of high convective flux of solutes in biofilm channels not necessarily is coupled with an equally high net convective contribution to mass transfer from bulk liquid into biofilm.

[1]  H. Lappin-Scott,et al.  Relationship between mass transfer coefficient and liquid flow velocity in heterogenous biofilms using microelectrodes and confocal microscopy. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Constrained discounted Markov decision processes and Hamiltonian cycles , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Bruce E. Rittmann,et al.  Simulation of multispecies biofilm development in three dimensions , 1999 .

[4]  M.C.M. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Mass transfer and reaction in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor , 1998 .

[5]  H. Becker.  Dimensionless Parameters: Theory and Methodology , 1976 .

[6]  Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht,et al.  A more unifying hypothesis for biofilm structures , 1997 .

[7]  J. J. Heijnen,et al.  Discrete-differential modelling of biofilm structure , 1999 .

[8]  W. Deen.  Analysis Of Transport Phenomena , 1998 .

[9]  D. Beer,et al.  Liquid flow and mass transport in heterogeneous biofilms , 1996 .

[10]  J J Heijnen,et al.  A theoretical study on the effect of surface roughness on mass transport and transformation in biofilms. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Slawomir W. Hermanowicz,et al.  Two-dimensional simulations of biofilm development: effects of external environmental conditions , 1999 .

[12]  Wolfgang Hackbusch,et al.  Theorie und Numerik elliptischer Differentialgleichungen , 1986, Teubner Studienbücher.

[13]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Heterogeneity of biofilms in rotating annular reactors: Occurrence, structure, and consequences , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biofilm structure with a hybrid differential-discrete cellular automaton approach. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Bruce E. Rittmann,et al.  How biofilm clusters affect substrate flux and ecological selection , 1999 .

[16]  S. Altobelli,et al.  Experimental and conceptual studies on mass transport in biofilms , 1995 .

[17]  J. Wimpenny,et al.  A unifying hypothesis for the structure of microbial biofilms based on cellular automaton models , 1997 .

[18]  A. Schramm,et al.  Micro-environments and mass transfer phenomena in biofilms studied with microsensors , 1999 .

[19]  A. Chorin.  A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow Problems , 1997 .

[20]  Robert L. Street,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Mixed-Culture Biofilm , 1984 .

[21]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Evaluating 3-D and 1-D mathematical models for mass transport in heterogeneous biofilms , 2000 .