On the Plurality of Verbs

This paper pursues some of the consequences of the idea that there are (at least) two sources for distributive/cumulative interpretations in English. One source is lexical pluralization: All predicative stems are born as plurals, as Manfred Krifka and Fred Landman have argued. Lexical pluralization should be available in any language and should not depend on the particular make-up of its DPs. I suggest that the other source of cumulative/distributive interpretations in English is directly provided by plural DPs. DPs with plural agreement features can ‘release’ those features to pluralize adjacent verbal projections. If there is a lexical source for distributive/cumulative interpretations, there should be instances of such interpretations with singular DPs. But there should also be cases of distributive/cumulative interpretations that require the presence of DPs with plural agreement morphology. What is the role of events in all of this? Events have played a major role in the semantics of plurality since the pioneering work of Barry Schein and Peter Lasersohn. Yet to the present day, there is no consensus about the need of event-based accounts of plurality. Non-eventbased analyses of plural phenomena continue to be proposed. The phenomena discussed in this paper all present small or not so small conceptual problems for event-less analyses, but can be given elegant accounts within frameworks that incorporate some version of a Davidsonian event semantics. The hope is, then, that an event semantics for plurals might at least be a good bet about reality.

[1]  Jo-wang Lin,et al.  Distributivity in Chinese and its Implications , 1998 .

[2]  H. Borer.  In name only , 2005 .

[3]  B. Schein.  Plurals and Events , 1994 .

[4]  Anthony S. Kroch,et al.  The semantics of scope in English , 1979 .

[5]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution , 1992 .

[6]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[7]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Telicity and the Meaning of Objective Case , 2002 .

[8]  Jason Eisner,et al.  Lexical Semantics , 2020, The Handbook of English Linguistics.

[9]  R. S. Schwarzschild.  On the Meaning of Definite Plural Noun Phrases , 1991 .

[10]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[11]  David L. Davidson,et al.  The Logical Form of Action Sentences , 2001 .

[12]  M. Krifka.  The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[13]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  On the Semantic Markedness of F-Features , 2005 .

[14]  Rong Yang,et al.  Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese , 2002 .

[15]  J. Sadock,et al.  Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them , 1975 .

[16]  Östen Dahl,et al.  Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution : zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen , 1991 .

[17]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Cumulation is needed: A reply to Winter , 2000 .

[18]  Sei-Rang Oh,et al.  Distributivity in an Event Semantics , 2001 .

[19]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Distributivity and Dependency , 2000 .

[20]  R. Schwarzschild.  Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity , 1993 .

[21]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[22]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Cumulation is Needed: A Reply to Winter (2000) , 2000 .

[23]  Veerle van Geenhoven.  For -adverbials, Frequentative Aspect, and Pluractionality , 2004 .

[24]  Peter Lasersohn.  Plurality, Conjunction and Events , 1994 .

[25]  Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,et al.  Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices , 2000 .

[26]  L. Matthewson.  On Distributivity and Pluractionality , 2000 .

[27]  R. Hursthouse.  THE LOGIC OF DECISION AND ACTION , 1969 .

[28]  H. Rullmann,et al.  General Number and the Semantics and Pragmatics of Indefinite Bare Nouns in Mandarin Chinese , 2006, Where Semantics meets Pragmatics.

[29]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Generic book , 1997 .

[30]  A. Kratzer.  Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[31]  Peter Nathan Lasersohn,et al.  Group action and spatio-temporal proximity , 1990 .

[32]  Fred Landman,et al.  Events and Plurality: The Jerusalem Lectures , 2001 .

[33]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  The plural involves comparison , 2004 .

[34]  Johan Rooryck,et al.  Phrase structure and the lexicon , 1996 .

[35]  Godehard Link.  Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy , 1997 .

[36]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Numeral Classifiers and Substantival Number: Problems in the Genesis of a Linguistic Type. Working Papers on Language Universals, No. 9. , 1972 .

[37]  Sigrid Beck.  Reciprocals are Definites , 2001 .

[38]  Godehard Link.  The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[39]  Fred Landman,et al.  Events And Plurality , 2000 .

[40]  R. Scha.  Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification , 1984 .

[41]  Michael White,et al.  Twigs, Sequences and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates , 2001 .

[42]  Malte Zimmermann,et al.  Boys buying two sausages each: On the syntax and semantics of distance-distributivity , 2002 .

[43]  Friederike Moltmann.  Parts and Wholes in Semantics , 1997 .

[44]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  Types of plural individuals , 1992 .

[45]  E. Thompson,et al.  The syntax of tense , 1996 .

[46]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Reciprocity and Cumulative Predication , 1998 .

[47]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  当代语义理论指南 = The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory , 2015 .

[48]  Barry Schein,et al.  Event logic and the interpretation of plurals , 1986 .

[49]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  The Logic of Decision and Action , 1967 .

[50]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  What Applicative Heads Apply To , 2000 .