Arousal, Interest and Auction Bidders

Arousal is a diffuse emotional response that can have multiple effects. We present three studies that investigated arousal's effects on auctions, which are increasingly important engines of contemporary economies and represent social contexts particularly likely to generate and be influenced by arousal. We manipulated arousal in three ways: by changing two essential elements of auctions (stakes and time pressure); by asking participants to recall a competition in which they felt aroused or calm; and by creating cognitive dissonance. Across the studies, arousal consistently increased interest and bidding. The results support the competitive arousal model (Ku, Malhotra, & Murnighan, 2005) and provide a more complete picture of the effects of arousal, extending theoretical perspectives from romantic attraction, which suggest that arousal is a diffuse emotional state that can be misattributed as interest, to auctions. The discussion explores the broader implications of the role of arousal in decision making and markets.

[1]  Haim Mano,et al.  The influence of pre-existing negative affect on store purchase intentions , 1999 .

[2]  R. Zajonc SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[3]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information , 1990 .

[4]  J. Kagel 7. Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1995 .

[5]  J Cooper,et al.  Dissonance and the pill: an attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .

[7]  M. Pallak,et al.  General motivational effects of dissonance arousal. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance May Enhance Sympathetic Tonus, but Attitudes Are Changed to Reduce Negative Affect Rather than Arousal , 1990 .

[9]  D. Dutton,et al.  Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  H. Mano,et al.  The Structure and Intensity of Emotional Experiences: Method and Context Convergence. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a "don't remind me" effect. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Haim Mano,et al.  Affect and persuasion: The influence of pleasantness and arousal on attitude formation and message elaboration , 1997 .

[13]  David Lucking-Reiley,et al.  Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the internet , 1999 .

[14]  J. Singer,et al.  Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. , 1962, Psychological review.

[15]  G. Hockey,et al.  Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[16]  G. L. White,et al.  Passionate love and the misattribution of arousal. , 1981 .

[17]  R. E. Knox,et al.  Trivial incentives, marginal comprehension, and dubious generalizations from Prisoner's Dilemma studies. , 1971 .

[18]  Haim Mano,et al.  Risk-Taking, Framing Effects, and Affect , 1994 .

[19]  H. Mano Judgments under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation , 1992 .

[20]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Starting low but ending high: a reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  David H. Reiley Auctions on the Internet: What's Being Auctioned, and How? , 2000 .

[22]  R. Croyle,et al.  Dissonance arousal: physiological evidence. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Haim Mano,et al.  Multi-attribute choice and affect: The influence of naturally occurring and manipulated moods on choice processes , 1993 .

[24]  J. Cooper,et al.  A New Look at Dissonance Theory , 1984 .

[25]  D. Malhotra,et al.  Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions , 2005 .

[26]  Darius K.-S. Chan,et al.  The Effects of Reward Structure and Reciprocity in Social Dilemmas , 1993 .

[27]  J. Bryant,et al.  Effect of residual excitation on the emotional response to provocation and delayed aggressive behavior. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  David S. Cates The Effects of Time Pressure on Social Cognitive Problem-Solving by Aggressive and Nonaggressive Boys. , 1996 .

[29]  James A. Shepperd Remedying Motivation and Productivity Loss in Collective Settings , 1995 .

[30]  J Cooper,et al.  Arousal as a necessary condition for attitude change following induced compliance. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  J. Kagel,et al.  Winner’s Curse , 2014 .

[32]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  “Some Things You Learn Aren't So”: Cohen's Paradox, Asch's Paradigm, and the Interpretation of Interaction , 1995 .

[36]  John H. Kagel,et al.  1 Bidding in Common-Value Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research , 2009 .

[37]  M. Shubik The Dollar Auction game: a paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation , 1971 .