Impact of local control and surgical lymph node evaluation in localized paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee

Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PT‐RMS) carries a favorable prognosis, but questions persist regarding optimal management. Our goal was to determine the importance of primary tumor resection and surgical assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes during staging in patients with PT‐RMS. We analyzed patients with localized PT‐RMS enrolled onto one of four Children's Oncology Group studies (D9602, ARST0331, D9803 or ARST0531). Surgical resection of the primary tumor prior to chemotherapy and radiotherapy was encouraged when possible with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) recommended for patients ≥10 years of age. Among 279 patients (median 8.1 years old), most tumors were resected with negative margins (78.5%) and most patients did not have radiographic enlargement of regional lymph nodes (90.3%). In patients older than 10 years, imaging alone will miss over 51.5% of nodal disease. Five‐year event‐free survival (EFS) was 92.0% (95% CI 88.4%‐95.6%). Sampling ≥7 to 12 retroperitoneal lymph nodes appeared optimal for detecting positive nodes; while there was a trend toward improved EFS among those undergoing template RPLND, this was not statistically significant (P = .068). Age (P = .28), N‐stage (P = .39), T‐stage (P = .11) and pathologic node involvement (P = .53) were not associated with overall survival. However, older age and larger tumor size had an additive impact on EFS (P = .027) though not overall survival (P = .13). In conclusion, outcomes for patients with PT‐RMS are excellent. Reliance on imaging to detect nodal involvement will miss pathologic node involvement and may result in undertreatment. Surgical nodal staging requires at least 7 to 12 nodes to accurately identify patients with regional nodal disease.

[1]  A. Saltzman Faculty Opinions recommendation of Impact of Local Control and Surgical Lymph Node Evaluation in Localized Paratesticular Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee. , 2020, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[2]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Demographic and Treatment Variables Influencing Outcome for Localized Paratesticular Rhabdomyosarcoma: Results From a Pooled Analysis of North American and European Cooperative Groups. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Addition of Vincristine and Irinotecan to Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Does Not Improve Outcome for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  M. Stevens,et al.  Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma in children and adolescents—Outcome and patterns of relapse when utilizing a nonsurgical strategy for lymph node staging: Report from the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) Malignant Mesenchymal Tumour 89 and 95 studies , 2017, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[5]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Reduction of cyclophosphamide dose for patients with subset 2 low‐risk rhabdomyosarcoma is associated with an increased risk of recurrence: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group , 2017, Cancer.

[6]  D. Rodeberg,et al.  Quality assessment of lymph node sampling in rhabdomyosarcoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program study. , 2017, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[7]  S. King,et al.  Utility of PET/CT to Evaluate Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results of ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Trial. , 2017, Radiology.

[8]  A. Schuck,et al.  Outcome, Treatment, and Treatment Failures in Patients Suffering Localized Embryonal Paratesticular Rhabdomyosarcoma: Results From the ”Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe” Trials CWS-86, -91, -96, and -2002P , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[9]  D. Dynda,et al.  Primary tumor size predicts pathologic findings in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes in patients with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma , 2014, Virchows Archiv.

[10]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Shorter-duration therapy using vincristine, dactinomycin, and lower-dose cyclophosphamide with or without radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  T. Klingebiel,et al.  Impact of hemiscrotectomy on outcome of patients with embryonal paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: results from the Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group Studies CWS-86, 91, 96 and 2002P. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[12]  A. Paulino,et al.  Lymph node management in patients with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma , 2013, Cancer.

[13]  S. Spunt,et al.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Soft tissue sarcomas , 2013, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[14]  N. Breslow,et al.  Clinicopathologic findings predictive of relapse in children with stage III favorable-histology Wilms tumor. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  D. Hawkins,et al.  Rhabdomyosarcoma: Review of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) soft‐tissue Sarcoma committee experience and rationale for current COG studies , 2012, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[16]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Results of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group D9602 protocol, using vincristine and dactinomycin with or without cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy, for newly diagnosed patients with low-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's O , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  H. B. Marsden,et al.  Treatment of nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood and adolescence: third study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology--SIOP Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 89. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Stevens,et al.  Treatment of children with nonmetastatic paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: results of the Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors studies (MMT 84 and MMT 89) of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: report from the Italian and German Cooperative Group. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  S. Donaldson,et al.  Controversies in the management of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: is staging retroperitoneal lymph node dissection necessary for adolescents with resected paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma? , 2001, Seminars in pediatric surgery.

[22]  E. Gehan,et al.  Retroperitoneal node biopsy in paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. , 1994, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[23]  M. Carli,et al.  Paratesticular Rhabdomyosarcoma in Childhood: Experience of the Italian Cooperative Study , 1988, Tumori.

[24]  E. Gehan,et al.  Paratesticular sarcoma in childhood and adolescence: A report from the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies I and II, 1973–1983 , 1987, Cancer.

[25]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Detection of lymph node metastases in pediatric and adolescent/young adult sarcoma: Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging—A prospective trial , 2017, Cancer.