Crowdsourcing Public Opinion Using Urban Pervasive Technologies: Lessons From Real‐Life Experiments in Oulu

The civic potential of pervasive computing technologies has been increasingly explored within academic and urban planning communities. One vision is of communities and cities enriched with pervasive computing, where citizens can leverage the new technology and interfaces for their own purposes, and at the same time be empowered to be heard through the use of such technology. This article reports lessons learned from a project that created public human interfaces for interacting with city officials in Oulu, Finland. We focus on civic engagement and reflect on a deployment of public interactive crowdsourcing technologies that are openly available to everyone, right in the heart of the city. The series of field trials reported here involve public displays, mobile phones, and Internet technologies. We find differences in the performance of different kinds of input mechanisms, and present lessons learned from cooperating with officials in a joint civic engagement effort.

[1]  Margot Brereton,et al.  A qualitative analysis of local community communications , 2006, OZCHI '06.

[2]  Massimo Zancanaro,et al.  Agora2.0: enhancing civic participation through a public display , 2013, C&T '13.

[3]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Supporting Community Awareness with Interactive Displays , 2012, Computer.

[4]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Requirements and design space for interactive public displays , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[5]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  Capture the Moment: "In the Wild" Longitudinal Case Study of Situated Snapshots Captured Through an Urban Screen in a Community Setting , 2015, CSCW.

[6]  John R. Hibbing,et al.  What Is it about Government that Americans Dislike , 2001 .

[7]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[8]  Robert P. Leone,et al.  Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production , 2003 .

[9]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’ , 2011, New Media Soc..

[10]  R. Sharp,et al.  The 2005 UbiApp Workshop: What Makes Good Application-Led Research? , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[11]  E. Glenn.  Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City , 2009 .

[12]  Marcus Foth,et al.  From movie screens to moving screens : mapping qualities of new urban interactions , 2013 .

[13]  Kristina Shampanier,et al.  Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products , 2007 .

[14]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action , 1982 .

[15]  Marko Turpeinen,et al.  From Space to Stage: How Interactive Screens Will Change Urban Life , 2011, Computer.

[16]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Crowdsourcing on the spot: altruistic use of public displays, feasibility, performance, and behaviours , 2013, UbiComp.

[17]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods , 2011, CHI.

[18]  Merrill Cooper,et al.  Overcoming barriers to the positive development and engagement of ethno-racial minority youth in Canada , 2008 .

[19]  R. Bekkers,et al.  Generalized Trust Through Civic Engagement? Evidence from Five National Panel Studies , 2015 .

[20]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Understanding Digital Cities , 1999, Digital Cities.

[21]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Open Display Networks: A Communications Medium for the 21st Century , 2012, Computer.

[22]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices , 2012, CHI.

[23]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  How to evaluate public displays , 2012, PerDis.

[24]  Caroline Kelly,et al.  The social psychology of collective action : identity, injustice and gender , 1999 .

[25]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  Community is the message: viewing networked public displays through McLuhan's lens of figure and ground , 2014, MAB '14.

[26]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  Situated & Social Feedback in the City , 2011 .

[27]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Eliciting situated feedback: A comparison of paper, web forms and public displays , 2014, Displays.

[28]  T. Ishida,et al.  Digital cities : technologies, experiences, and future perspectives , 2000 .

[29]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  From School Food to Skate Parks in a Few Clicks: Using Public Displays to Bootstrap Civic Engagement of the Young , 2012, Pervasive.

[30]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  What's in it for me: Exploring the Real-World Value Proposition of Pervasive Displays , 2014, PerDis.

[31]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Application discoverability on multipurpose public displays: popularity comes at a price , 2013, PerDis.

[32]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  P-LAYERS -- A Layered Framework Addressing the Multifaceted Issues Facing Community-Supporting Public Display Deployments , 2013, TCHI.

[33]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  Multipurpose Interactive Public Displays in the Wild: Three Years Later , 2012, Computer.

[34]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Community Involvement: Opportunities and Challenges in Socializing Adults to Participate in Society , 2002 .

[35]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1991 .

[36]  Jörg Müller,et al.  MyPosition: sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization , 2014, CSCW.

[37]  Carol Strohecker,et al.  TexTales: Creating Interactive Forums with Urban Publics , 2009 .

[38]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Introducción a la psicología comunitaria , 2002 .

[39]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement , 2012, DIS '12.

[40]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[41]  D. Chavis,et al.  Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development , 1990 .

[42]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Thanks and tweets: comparing two public displays , 2011, CSCW.

[43]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Large displays in urban life - from exhibition halls to media facades , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[44]  Mehmet Gonullu,et al.  Department of Computer Science and Engineering , 2011 .

[45]  Seyed Hamid Mohammadi,et al.  Civic Engagement, Citizen Participation and Quality of Governance in Iran , 2011 .

[46]  Timo Ojala,et al.  Municipal WiFi and interactive displays: Appropriation of new technologies in public urban spaces , 2014 .

[47]  Joanna Saad-Sulonen,et al.  The value of Community Informatics to participatory urban planning and design: a case-study in Helsinki , 2010, J. Community Informatics.