Active learning for image quality assessment by model observer

In medical imaging, it is widely accepted that image quality should be evaluated using a task-based approach in which one evaluates human observer performance for a given diagnostic task. Unfortunately, human observer studies with expert readers are costly and time-demanding. To confront this problem, model observers (MO) have been used as surrogates for human observers. MOs typically can accurately predict human diagnostic performance but some types of MOs require sets of images and human observer scores for tuning (training). Current literature does not provide guidance on how to choose the training data set. Therefore, in this work we present a heuristic active learning approach, using uncertainty sampling, to the problem of selecting good MOs training data sets. The presented results indicate that the proposed data set selection approach, together with a learning model observer based on the relevance vector machine, has excellent performance in predicting human observer performance as measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).

[1]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  M.N. Wernick,et al.  Learning a nonlinear channelized observer for image quality assessment , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[3]  Rong Jin,et al.  Batch mode active learning and its application to medical image classification , 2006, ICML.

[4]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[5]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[6]  Miles N. Wernick,et al.  Optimization of iterative reconstructions of /sup 99m/Tc cardiac SPECT studies using numerical observers , 2001 .

[7]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Employing EM and Pool-Based Active Learning for Text Classification , 1998, ICML.

[8]  Hui Lin,et al.  How to select a good training-data subset for transcription: submodular active selection for sequences , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[9]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Selective Sampling Using the Query by Committee Algorithm , 1997, Machine Learning.

[10]  Mahdi M. Kalayeh,et al.  Generalization Evaluation of Machine Learning Numerical Observers for Image Quality Assessment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Learning a Channelized Observer for Image Quality Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  J. Peacock Two-dimensional goodness-of-fit testing in astronomy , 1983 .

[13]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001 .

[14]  William A. Gale,et al.  A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers , 1994, SIGIR '94.

[15]  Jovan G Brankov,et al.  Evaluation of the channelized Hotelling observer with an internal-noise model in a train-test paradigm for cardiac SPECT defect detection , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.