The effects of visual attention on social behavior

Psychology has made tremendous strides in understanding the effects that social stimuli have on attention. However, one aspect that has received relatively less consideration is the role that attention plays in social interactions. The present review examines how attentional orienting, engagement, and communication affect and shape a diverse array of social processes, including person perception, discrimination, and group structures. Specifically, the empirical evidence reviewed here points to the notions that (1) attentional orienting mediates learning and acquisition of others' attitudes and reflects or reinforces the use of stereotypical social information; (2) attentional engagement increases the accuracy of impression formation and modulates impression valence (positive vs. negative) depending on contextual and cultural factors; (3) attentional communication conveys socially appropriate behavior depending on interpersonal factors such as familiarity, intimacy, and social status. Overall, this review reveals that the links between cognitive and social psychology are strong and bidirectional, binds that hold the potential for many new and exciting discoveries in the near future.

[1]  Benedek Kurdi,et al.  A 3D framework of implicit attitude change , 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Eric Hehman,et al.  Dress is a Fundamental Component of Person Perception , 2023, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[3]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Do individuation instructions reduce the cross-race effect? A registered replication of , 2023, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[4]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Feminist Social Vision: Seeing Through the Lens of Marginalized Perceivers , 2022, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[5]  Fabiola H. Gerpott,et al.  Eye gaze and visual attention as a window into leadership and followership: A review of empirical insights and future directions , 2022, The Leadership Quarterly.

[6]  A. Kingstone,et al.  De-evolving human eyes: The effect of eye camouflage on human attention , 2022, Cognition.

[7]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Observational evaluative conditioning is sensitive to relational information , 2022, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Freeman,et al.  Learning to judge a book by its cover: Rapid acquisition of facial stereotypes , 2022, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[9]  Brian T. Kraus,et al.  Self-referential processing accounts for cultural variation in self-enhancement versus criticism: An electrocortical investigation. , 2021, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Matthias S. Gobel,et al.  Gender and perceived cooperation modulate visual attention in a joint spatial cueing task , 2021, Visual Cognition.

[11]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Your turn to speak? Audiovisual social attention in the lab and in the wild , 2021, Visual Cognition.

[12]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Does Cross-Race Contact Improve Cross-Race Face Perception? A Meta-Analysis of the Cross-Race Deficit and Contact , 2021, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[13]  A. Senju,et al.  Cultural differences in mutual gaze during face-to-face interactions: A dual head-mounted eye-tracking study , 2021, Visual Cognition.

[14]  J. Ristic,et al.  Intrapersonal Behavioral Coordination and Expressive Accuracy During First Impressions , 2021, Social psychological and personality science.

[15]  A. Bayliss,et al.  Standing out from the crowd: Both cue numerosity and social information affect attention in multi-agent contexts , 2021, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Arnold K. Ho,et al.  Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  A. Bayliss,et al.  From Gaze Perception to Social Cognition: The Shared-Attention System , 2021, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  Junghee Lee,et al.  Self-Referential Processing Predicts Social Cognitive Ability , 2021 .

[19]  Jill A Dosso,et al.  I spy without my eye: Covert attention in human social interactions , 2020, Cognition.

[20]  P. Anderson,et al.  Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder. , 2020, Psychological assessment.

[21]  J. Ristic,et al.  Attention promotes accurate impression formation. , 2020, Journal of personality.

[22]  S. Wass,et al.  Interpersonal Neural Entrainment during Early Social Interaction , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  J. Ristic,et al.  Attention AND mentalizing? Reframing a debate on social orienting of attention , 2020 .

[24]  S. Shamay-Tsoory,et al.  The sociality of social inhibition of return , 2019, Cognition.

[25]  Lauren L. Emberson,et al.  Infants use knowledge of emotions to augment face perception: Evidence of top-down modulation of perception early in life , 2019, Cognition.

[26]  S. Kraus,et al.  In the eye of a leader: Eye-directed gazing shapes perceptions of leaders' charisma , 2019, The Leadership Quarterly.

[27]  A. Todorov,et al.  Can we reduce facial biases? Persistent effects of facial trustworthiness on sentencing decisions , 2019, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[28]  U. Schimmack The Implicit Association Test: A Method in Search of a Construct , 2019, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[29]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Tracking the Leader: Gaze Behavior in Group Interactions , 2019, iScience.

[30]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Verbal Descriptions of Cue Direction Affect Object Desirability , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[31]  Eric Hehman,et al.  Toward a comprehensive model of face impressions: What we know, what we do not, and paths forward , 2019, Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

[32]  Aleksi H. Syrjämäki,et al.  The effects of social exclusion on processing of social information - A cognitive psychology perspective. , 2018, The British journal of social psychology.

[33]  Jari K. Hietanen,et al.  Affective Eye Contact: An Integrative Review , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[34]  J. Ristic,et al.  How attention gates social interactions , 2018, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Kai Vogeley,et al.  The “Social Gaze Space”: A Taxonomy for Gaze-Based Communication in Triadic Interactions , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[36]  Anneli Kylliäinen,et al.  Your attention makes me smile: Direct gaze elicits affiliative facial expressions , 2018, Biological Psychology.

[37]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Race, Power, and Reflexive Gaze Following , 2017 .

[38]  Garriy Shteynberg A collective perspective: shared attention and the mind. , 2017, Current opinion in psychology.

[39]  Fabiola H. Gerpott,et al.  In the eye of the beholder? An eye-tracking experiment on emergent leadership in team interactions , 2017 .

[40]  Gina M. Grimshaw,et al.  Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task , 2017, Psychological Research.

[41]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Social Beliefs and Visual Attention: How the Social Relevance of a Cue Influences Spatial Orienting , 2017, Cognitive science.

[42]  S. Tipper,et al.  Examining the Durability of Incidentally Learned Trust from Gaze Cues , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  Matthias S. Gobel,et al.  How Different Cultures Look at Faces Depends on the Interpersonal Context , 2017, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[44]  Charisse B. Pickron,et al.  Follow My Gaze: Face Race and Sex Influence Gaze-Cued Attention in Infancy. , 2017, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[45]  S. Tipper,et al.  Incidental learning of trust from eye-gaze: Effects of race and facial trustworthiness , 2017 .

[46]  L. Oakes,et al.  Scanning of own‐ versus other‐race faces in infants from racially diverse or homogenous communities , 2017, Developmental psychobiology.

[47]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  First Impressions From Faces , 2017, Current directions in psychological science.

[48]  Bradley D. Mattan,et al.  How Social Status Shapes Person Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[49]  G. McArthur,et al.  Simulating social interactions for the experimental investigation of joint attention , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[50]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infant attention to same- and other-race faces , 2017, Cognition.

[51]  E. Knowles,et al.  Social Class and the Motivational Relevance of Other Human Beings , 2016, Psychological science.

[52]  Jari K. Hietanen,et al.  Watching Eyes effects: When others meet the self , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.

[53]  Effie J. Pereira,et al.  The eyes don't have it after all? Attention is not biased towards faces or eyes , 2016 .

[54]  J. Hietanen Eye contact: to see and to be seen , 2016 .

[55]  J. Hietanen,et al.  The effects of genuine eye contact on visuospatial and selective attention. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  More Than Meets the Eye: Split-Second Social Perception , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  S. Tipper,et al.  Vulnerability to depression is associated with a failure to acquire implicit social appraisals , 2016, Cognition & emotion.

[58]  C. Becchio,et al.  Followers are not followed: Observed group interactions modulate subsequent social attention. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  Rebecca Neel,et al.  Does Seeing Faces of Young Black Boys Facilitate the Identification of Threatening Stimuli? , 2016, Psychological science.

[60]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Breaking the Fourth Wall of Cognitive Science , 2016 .

[61]  Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,et al.  Gazing at me: the importance of social meaning in understanding direct-gaze cues , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  The duality of gaze: eyes extract and signal social information during sustained cooperative and competitive dyadic gaze , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[63]  Garriy Shteynberg Shared Attention , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[64]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Speaking and Listening with the Eyes: Gaze Signaling during Dyadic Interactions , 2015, PloS one.

[65]  A. Bayliss,et al.  Social orienting in gaze leading: a mechanism for shared attention , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  The Impact of Same- and Other-Race Gaze Distractors on the Control of Saccadic Eye Movements , 2015, Perception.

[67]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Wearable computing: Will it make people prosocial? , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[68]  D. Carney,et al.  Some evidence for the nonverbal contagion of racial bias , 2015 .

[69]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  The dual function of social gaze , 2015, Cognition.

[70]  Shota Uono,et al.  Eye Contact Perception in the West and East: A Cross-Cultural Study , 2015, PloS one.

[71]  J. Hietanen,et al.  There is more to eye contact than meets the eye , 2015, Cognition.

[72]  Friederike Funk,et al.  Social attributions from faces bias human choices , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  Marco R. Elena,et al.  When seeing is more than looking: Intentional gaze modulates object desirability. , 2014, Emotion.

[74]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Natural gaze signaling in a social context , 2014 .

[75]  K. Olson,et al.  Preference for high status predicts implicit outgroup bias among children from low-status groups. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[76]  Holly Bridge,et al.  A review of neuroimaging studies of race-related prejudice: does amygdala response reflect threat? , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[77]  Timothy N. Welsh,et al.  Catching Eyes , 2014, Psychological science.

[78]  K. Vogeley,et al.  From gaze cueing to dual eye-tracking: Novel approaches to investigate the neural correlates of gaze in social interaction , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[79]  S. Tipper,et al.  I Want to Help You, But I Am Not Sure Why: Gaze-Cuing Induces Altruistic Giving , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[80]  Lindsey M. Rodriguez,et al.  Self-Determination Theory and Romantic Relationship Processes , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[81]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Looking while eating: The importance of social context to social attention , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[82]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  Targeting the Good Target , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[83]  Wieske van Zoest,et al.  Gender and Facial Dominance in Gaze Cuing: Emotional Context Matters in the Eyes That We Follow , 2013, PloS one.

[84]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Attention to Eye Contact in the West and East: Autonomic Responses and Evaluative Ratings , 2013, PloS one.

[85]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Handbook of the history of social psychology , 2012 .

[86]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  The directional flow of visual information transfer between pedestrians , 2012, Biology Letters.

[87]  G. Galfano,et al.  Social status gates social attention in humans , 2012, Biology Letters.

[88]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  Perception and Motivation in Face Recognition , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[89]  Simon Garnier,et al.  Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[90]  O. Corneille,et al.  L-eye to me: The combined role of Need for Cognition and facial trustworthiness in mimetic desires , 2012, Cognition.

[91]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Racial Group Membership Is Associated to Gaze-Mediated Orienting in Italy , 2011, PloS one.

[92]  Jari K. Hietanen,et al.  Eye contact and arousal: The effects of stimulus duration , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[93]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  Eye'm lovin' it! The role of gazing awareness in mimetic desires ☆ , 2011 .

[94]  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw,et al.  Potential social interactions are important to social attention , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[95]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking , 2010, Cognition.

[96]  H. Aarts,et al.  When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. , 2010, Emotion.

[97]  Victoria Savalei,et al.  Assessing Mediational Models: Testing and Interval Estimation for Indirect Effects , 2010, Multivariate behavioral research.

[98]  L. Uziel Rethinking Social Desirability Scales , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[99]  Stephen V. Shepherd,et al.  Following Gaze: Gaze-Following Behavior as a Window into Social Cognition , 2010, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[100]  A. Little,et al.  Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[101]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Get real! Resolving the debate about equivalent social stimuli , 2009 .

[102]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[103]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[104]  A. Baird,et al.  Attending to Threat: Race-based Patterns of Selective Attention. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[105]  Heather Patrick,et al.  Self-Determination Theory as a Fundamental Theory of Close Relationships , 2008 .

[106]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Gaze following , 2008, Current Biology.

[107]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[108]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Gaze selection in complex social scenes , 2008 .

[109]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit : Toward a solution to an insidious problem , 2007 .

[110]  Peter J. Hills,et al.  Short Article: Reducing the Own-Race Bias in Face Recognition by Shifting Attention , 2006 .

[111]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self , 2006, NeuroImage.

[112]  A. Senju,et al.  Direct gaze captures visuospatial attention , 2005 .

[113]  T. Ito,et al.  Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[114]  N. Ambady,et al.  Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. , 1993 .

[115]  S. Belmore Determinants of attention during impression formation. , 1987 .

[116]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[117]  M. Back,et al.  Do accurate personality impressions benefit early relationship development? The bidirectional associations between accuracy and liking. , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[118]  Mario Dalmaso,et al.  Re-encountering individuals who previously engaged in joint gaze modulates subsequent gaze cueing. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[119]  T. Shackelford,et al.  Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology , 2015 .

[120]  G. Semin,et al.  I can see, hear, and smell your fear: comparing olfactory and audiovisual media in fear communication. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[121]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[122]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Dangerous Enough: Moderating Racial Bias with Contextual Threat Cues. , 2011, Journal of experimental social psychology.