From Public Value to Social Value of Digital Government: Co-Creation and Social Innovation in European Union Initiatives

This paper discusses the development of key features in European Union policy and service redesign, based on social innovative practices where cocreation and the related phenomenon of digital social innovation have a high potential impact. The idea underneath this claim is that Information and Communication Technologies are becoming increasingly pervasive in the design, development and delivery of social innovation and co-creation initiatives which should not be limited to service delivery, rather serve as the driver for opening-up governance systems and change the way public organizations are structured and policy designed and implemented. Consequently, the paper discusses the key elements identified for setting up open and collaborative governance systems, while, taking stock from the analysis of policy experiences and practices funded by the European Commission, an overview of main drivers and barriers are presented. The paper concludes outlining recommendations for future research, as well as implications and possible directions for policy.

[1]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[2]  Gianluigi Viscusi,et al.  Digital governance in the public sector: challenging the policy-maker's innovation dilemma , 2014, ICEGOV.

[3]  George A. Boyne,et al.  Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda , 2003 .

[4]  Victor Pestoff,et al.  Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production , 2014 .

[5]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[6]  Esteve Almirall,et al.  The City as a Lab , 2016 .

[7]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The virtual public servant: Ireland's public services broker , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[8]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[9]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Study on collaborative production in eGovernment (SMART 2010/0075) : Final Report ; Part. 2 Policy recommendations , 2012 .

[10]  Norma M. Riccucci.  The ''Old'' Public Management Versus the "New" Public Management: Where Does Public Administration Fit In? , 2001 .

[11]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Public Value: Theory and Practice , 2011 .

[12]  N. Couldry.  The myth of ‘us’: digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity , 2015 .

[13]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  Maturity Models in the Age of Digital Diversity: Beyond the Layne & Lee Legacy , 2012 .

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[16]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  The New Public Governance? 1 , 2006 .

[18]  Roland Traunmüller.  Open Government and Electronic Government: Some Considerations , 2014, EGOVIS.

[19]  Lars Tummers,et al.  SOCIAL INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK , 2013 .

[20]  I. Robeyns.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Human Development the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey , 2022 .

[21]  V. Ramaswamy.  Leading the transformation to co‐creation of value , 2009 .

[22]  C. Hood,et al.  From old public administration to new public management , 1994 .

[23]  Richard L. Priem.  A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation , 2007 .

[24]  Taco Brandsen,et al.  Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions , 2016 .

[25]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Helena Alves,et al.  Co-creation and innovation in public services , 2013 .

[27]  T. Bovaird,et al.  User and Community Coproduction of Public Services: What Influences Citizens to Coproduce? , 2014 .

[28]  C. Kyprianou.  Creating Value from the Outside In or the Inside Out: How Nascent Intermediaries Build Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces , 2018, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[29]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT , 2005 .

[30]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Value Capture and Crowdsourcing , 2013 .

[31]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  From Practice to Theory and back to Practice: Reflexivity in Measurement and Evaluation for Evidence-based Policy Making in the Information Society , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  J. Alford,et al.  Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social‐Exchange Perspective , 2002 .

[33]  Misuraca Gianluca,et al.  Measuring the public value of e-Government: the eGEP2.0 model , 2013 .

[34]  S. Osborne,et al.  Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? , 2016 .

[35]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation , 2005 .

[36]  V. Bekkers,et al.  Self-Organization and the Role of Government: How and why does self-organization evolve in the shadow of hierarchy? , 2016 .

[37]  Ruth M. Dixon,et al.  What We Have to Show for 30 Years of New Public Management: Higher Costs, More Complaints , 2015 .

[38]  M. Feldman,et al.  Order without Design: Information Production and Policy Making , 1991 .

[39]  Gianluigi Viscusi,et al.  Shaping public sector innovation theory: an interpretative framework for ICT-enabled governance innovation , 2015, Electronic Commerce Research.

[40]  P. Koellinger.  The Relationship between Technology, Innovation, and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence on E-Business in Europe , 2008 .

[41]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Ten Years of E-Government: The 'End of History' and New Beginning , 2010, EGOV.

[42]  Janine O'Flynn,et al.  Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings , 2009 .

[43]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  J. Alford,et al.  Public Value from Co-production by Clients , 2009 .

[45]  Thorhildur Jetzek,et al.  Managing complexity across multiple dimensions of liquid open data: The case of the Danish Basic Data Program , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[46]  Shelley L. Brickson.  Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value , 2007 .

[47]  M. Bacigalupo,et al.  ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment through Integrated Approaches to the Provision of Social Services , 2015 .

[48]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Information Systems for eGovernment - A Quality-of-Service Perspective , 2010 .

[49]  Gianluigi Viscusi,et al.  Social Innovation and Resilience: exploring the dynamics and impacts on the digital transformation of governance & society , 2018, ICEGOV.

[50]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective , 2007 .

[51]  James L. McKenney,et al.  An Historical Method for MIS Research: Steps and Assumptions , 1997, MIS Q..

[52]  Christiana Weber,et al.  Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comparing Social Value Creation , 2014 .

[53]  Kerimcan Ozcan,et al.  What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation , 2018 .

[54]  A. Renedo,et al.  The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care , 2017, PLoS biology.

[55]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .

[56]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Renegotiating public value with co-production , 2018 .

[57]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[58]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Assessing Social Value in Open Data Initiatives: A Framework , 2014, Future Internet.

[59]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change , 2007 .

[60]  Catarina Roseira,et al.  Open government data and the private sector: An empirical view on business models and value creation , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..