Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education

Graduate attributes have received considerable attention in recent years as universities seek to renew and articulate their purposes. Though many claims are made with respect to the implementation of graduate attributes, there is growing acceptance of the proposition that the strongest evidence of their achievement is their explicit embedding in assessment. While university policies espouse the assessment of graduate attributes, studies have suggested that the effectiveness of this undertaking is often limited by the influence of a range of diverse but interrelated factors. This paper discusses these influential factors and argues that the assessment of graduate attributes is a complex issue that is unlikely to be resolved unless these factors are addressed at a systemic level.

[1]  Gordon Suddaby,et al.  Impact of student support services and academic development programmes on student outcomes in undergraduate tertiary study: a synthesis of the research , 2005 .

[2]  John H. Schuh,et al.  Assessing Conditions to Enhance Educational Effectiveness: The Inventory for Student Engagement and Success , 2005 .

[3]  William M. Banks,et al.  The Assessment of Complex Learning Outcomes , 2003 .

[4]  Robert H. Ennis.  Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research , 1989 .

[5]  Marilyn Clarke,et al.  Graduate qualities in course design, teaching and assessment - academic and student perceptions , 2007 .

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[7]  D. Boud,et al.  Aligning assessment with long‐term learning , 2006 .

[8]  Gary W. Don,et al.  Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind , 2009 .

[9]  Sarah J. Stein,et al.  Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum , 2004 .

[10]  L. Harvey,et al.  Graduate attributes and their development , 2005 .

[11]  S. Barrie.  A research‐based approach to generic graduate attributes policy , 2004 .

[12]  Stuart Palmer,et al.  Authenticity in assessment: reflecting undergraduate study and professional practice , 2004 .

[13]  John M. Swales,et al.  Academic writing for graduate students : essential tasks and skills : a course for nonnative speakers of English , 1996 .

[14]  Declan Kennedy,et al.  Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide , 2006 .

[15]  S. Barrie.  Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of Graduates , 2006 .

[16]  Jennifer Sumsion,et al.  Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: a critical evaluation , 2004 .

[17]  Regan A. R. Gurung,et al.  Exploring More Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of the Mind , 2009 .

[18]  J. González,et al.  Tuning Educational Structures in Europe , 2003 .

[19]  P. Knight,et al.  Assessing learners in higher education , 1998 .

[20]  Paul Hager,et al.  Graduate attributes, learning and employability , 2007 .

[21]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  Locating generic graduate attributes in the Australian university curriculum: Taught? Mapped? Implied? Hidden? or 'missing in action'? , 2008 .

[22]  Ian Drummond,et al.  Personal transferable skills in higher education: the problems of implementing good practice , 1998 .

[23]  M. Mentkowski.  Accessible and adaptable elements of Alverno student assessment-as-learning: Strategies and challenges for peer review , 2006 .

[24]  Georgine Loacker,et al.  Self assessment at Alverno College , 2000 .

[25]  J Jastrow,et al.  THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING. , 1916, Science.

[26]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Defining authentic assessment: five dimensions of authenticity , 2007 .

[27]  George D. Kuh.  High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter , 2008 .