Lateral variations of the modal (a/b) values for the different regions of the world

Several catalogues of global earthquakes reported for the time period from 1900 to 2000 have been compiled to examine lateral variations of the modal (a/b) values as derived from the Gutenberg–Richter empirical law. For this purpose, the world was divided into 27 different seismic regions in terms of tectonic environments. The parameters a and b were calculated using the least-squares method. The modal values computed for each region were used to produce a global map of the modal values using a grid space of 3 � . The results show that a and b-values do not always supply much information about tectonic environments of the different regions. It is observed that the modal values estimated for different tectonic regions are consistent with seismicity of the world and represent global seismic sources better than a or b values. The highest modal values have been found in the oceanic subduction zones, and the lowest values in the oceanic ridges. Lowest b values are observed in trenches. These observations suggest that there is a correlation between apparent stresses and b values. Mapping of the modal values provides detailed images of the zones presenting low and high seismic activity and it may be used as a measure of seismic potential sources and relative hazard levels. # 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  K. Kaila,et al.  Seismotectonic maps of southwest Asia region comprising Eastern Turkey, Caucasus, Persian Plateau, Afghanistan and Hindukush , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  S. Miyamura.  Magnitude-Frequency Relation of Earthquakes and its Bearing on Geotectonics , 1962 .

[3]  T. Tsapanos,et al.  Geographical and vertical variation of the earth's seismicity , 1998 .

[4]  Warwick D. Smith.  Evidence For Precursory Changes In the Frequency‐Magnitude B‐Value , 1986 .

[5]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Frequency of Earthquakes in California , 1944, Nature.

[6]  A. Al-amri,et al.  Spatial distribution of the seismicity parameters in the Red Sea regions , 1998 .

[7]  T. Tsapanos.  b-Values of two tectonic parts in the circum-pacific belt , 1990 .

[8]  Cenka Christova.  Seismicity depth pattern, seismic energy and b value depth variation in the Hellenic Wadati-Benioff zone , 1992 .

[9]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Seismicity of the Earth and associated phenomena , 1950, MAUSAM.

[10]  R. Young,et al.  Space-time correlations ofb values with stress release , 1992 .

[11]  The seismic parameter b of the frequency-magnitude relation and its association with the geological zones in the area of Greece , 1985 .

[12]  Bernice Bender,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data , 1983 .

[13]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Seismicity and the subduction process , 1980 .

[14]  George L. Choy,et al.  Global patterns of radiated seismic energy and apparent stress , 1995 .

[15]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Seismic coupling and uncoupling at subduction zones , 1983 .

[16]  R. Olsson.  An estimation of the maximum b-value in the Gutenberg-Richter relation , 1999 .

[17]  b values of shallow earthquakes in Taiwan , 1988 .

[18]  M. Båth.  Earthquake recurrence of a particular type , 1981 .

[19]  K. Kaila,et al.  Seismotectonic maps of the European area , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  T. Lay,et al.  Modern Global Seismology , 1995 .

[21]  C. R. Allen,et al.  Relationship between seismicity and geologic structure in the Southern California region , 1965 .

[22]  Y. Bayrak,et al.  Crustal Seismicity In and Around Turkey , 1998 .