Survival Rates for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage III Ovarian Carcinoma by Cell Type: A Study of 262 Unselected Patients With Uniform Pathologic Review

Objective Published data are conflicting on the influence of cell type on prognosis in ovarian cancer. The recent separation of low-grade serous carcinoma as a distinctive cell type of ovarian cancer with an indolent behavior, in retrospect, suggests that survival in studies that have not separated this group may be inaccurate. Methods An unselected series of 262 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III ovarian carcinomas was studied. Diagnostic classification of each tumor was made with particular attention to recent refinements in cell-type classification. Survival curves were constructed according to Kaplan-Meier and compared with the log-rank test. Results The 5-year survival for 207 high-grade serous carcinomas was 40%, as compared with 71% for 18 patients with low-grade serous carcinoma (P = 0.0113). Low-grade serous carcinoma was significantly more likely to be optimally debulked (P = 0.0039) and significantly less likely to be substage IIIC (P < 0.0001). The survival for carcinosarcoma was significantly inferior to all serous carcinomas (P = 0.0322). The significance of this latter comparison was lost when carcinosarcomas were compared with only high-grade serous carcinoma (P > 0.05). Conclusions Low-grade serous carcinoma has a significantly better prognosis than high-grade serous carcinoma and also differs with regard to substage distribution and proportion of patients optimally debulked. Because of its excellent prognosis, failure to separate low-grade serous carcinomas, notwithstanding its infrequent occurrence, can change the results of survival analyses that do not make this separation.

[1]  B Rachet,et al.  Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data , 2011, Lancet.

[2]  J. Seidman,et al.  Prognostic Factors for Stage I Ovarian Carcinoma , 2010, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[3]  P. Rosenberg,et al.  Qualitative Age Interactions between Low-grade and High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  I. Shih,et al.  Defining the Cut Point Between Low-grade and High-grade Ovarian Serous Carcinomas: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Genetic Analysis , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[5]  S. Leung,et al.  Ovarian Carcinoma Subtypes Are Different Diseases: Implications for Biomarker Studies , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[6]  D. Gershenson,et al.  Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease , 2008, Current oncology reports.

[7]  S. Leung,et al.  Mixed Ovarian Epithelial Carcinomas With Clear Cell and Serous Components are Variants of High-grade Serous Carcinoma: An Interobserver Correlative and Immunohistochemical Study of 32 Cases , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[8]  J. Chan,et al.  Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  R. Soslow,et al.  Histologic subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: an overview. , 2008, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[10]  S. Plaxe Epidemiology of low-grade serous ovarian cancer. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  Ie-Ming Shih,et al.  Pathogenesis of Ovarian Cancer: Lessons From Morphology and Molecular Biology and Their Clinical Implications , 2008, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[12]  W. McCluggage,et al.  My approach to and thoughts on the typing of ovarian carcinomas , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[13]  Mark F. Munsell,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of a Two-tier System for Grading Ovarian Serous Carcinoma , 2007, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[14]  J. Seidman,et al.  Pathology of stage I versus stage III ovarian carcinoma with implications for pathogenesis and screening , 2007, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[15]  I. Horkayne-Szakaly,et al.  Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[16]  A. Sood,et al.  Clinical Behavior of Stage II-IV Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. Kigawa,et al.  Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective multicentre experience of 254 patients with complete surgical staging , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  J. Boyd,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles of Serous, Endometrioid, and Clear Cell Subtypes of Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  C. Gilks,et al.  Subclassification of Ovarian Surface Epithelial Tumors Based on Correlation of Histologic and Molecular Pathologic Data , 2004, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[20]  Michael T Deavers,et al.  Grading Ovarian Serous Carcinoma Using a Two-Tier System , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[21]  Brigitte M. Ronnett,et al.  The Histologic Type and Stage Distribution of Ovarian Carcinomas of Surface Epithelial Origin , 2004, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[22]  T. Rollason Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract , 2003, Springer New York.

[23]  Kathleen R. Cho,et al.  Surface Epithelial Tumors of the Ovary , 2011 .

[24]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[25]  A. Parwani Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma , 2009 .

[26]  P Maisonneuve,et al.  Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. , 2006, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.