A Theory of Tailorable Technology Design

Tailorable technologies are a class of information systems designed with the intention that users modify and redesign the technology in the context of use. Tailorable technologies support user goals, intentions, metaphor, and use patterns in the selection and integration of technology functions in the creation of new and unique information systems. We propose a theory of tailorable technology design and identify principles necessary for the initial design. Following a Kantian style of inquiry, we identified four definitional characteristics of tailorable technology: a dual design perspective, user engagement, recognizable environments, and component architectures. From these characteristics, we propose nine design principles that will support the phenomenon of tailoring. Through a year-long case study, we refined and evidenced the principles, finding found that designers of tailorable technologies build environments in which users can both interact and engage with the technology, supporting the proposed design principles. The findings highlight a distinction between a reflective environment, where users recognize and imagine uses for the technology, and an active environment in which users tailor the technology in accordance with the imagined uses. This research contributes to the clarification of the role of theory in design science, expands the concept of "possibilities for action" to IS design, and proposes a design theory of a class of information systems for testing and refinement.

[1]  José Legatheaux Martins,et al.  Coordination and Tailorability Issues in the design of a Generic Large Scale Groupware Platform , 1997 .

[2]  Christopher Fry,et al.  Experiments with Oval: a radically tailorable tool for cooperative work , 1992, CSCW '92.

[3]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Tailoring groupware for different scopes of validity , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Human-centered design considered harmful , 2005, INTR.

[5]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  DESIGN THEORIES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS - A NEED FOR MULTI-GROUNDING , 2004 .

[6]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[7]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[8]  Kim Halskov Madsen,et al.  Breakthrough by Breakdown: Metaphors and Structured Domains , 1988 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  The Role of Conventional Research Methods in Information Systems Action Research , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[11]  L. B. Archer,et al.  Systematic method for designers , 1963 .

[12]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[13]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy. , 1985 .

[14]  Chris North,et al.  Snap-together visualization: can users construct and operate coordinated visualizations? , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[16]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[17]  C. Dennis Allen,et al.  User customization of a word processor , 1996, CHI.

[18]  Bernard Mérialdo,et al.  Design of Extensible Component-Based Groupware , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[19]  Joseph S. Dumas,et al.  Discovering the way programmers think about new programming environments , 1995, CACM.

[20]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  DESIGNING VIRTUAL CUSTOMER ENVIRONMENTS FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT : TOWARD A THEORY , 2005 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[22]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[23]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[27]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[28]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons , 1990, CHI '90.

[29]  Nikolay Mehandjiev,et al.  Tailoring as Collaboration: The Mediating Role of Multiple Representations and Application Units , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Mauricio Cortes.  A Coordination Language For Building Collaborative Applications , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[31]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  The art of design: expressive intelligence in music , 1993 .

[32]  Dirk S. Hovorka,et al.  Functional Explanation in Information Systems , 2005, AMCIS.

[33]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[34]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[35]  Weigang Wang,et al.  Tailoring Groupware: The Cooperative Hypermedia Approach , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[36]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[37]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment , 2000 .

[38]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[39]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[42]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[43]  C. Lévi-Strauss.  The Savage Mind , 1967 .

[44]  Sean T. McGann,et al.  Coping With the Unplanned: The Dynamics of Improvisation in Information Systems Evolution Within and Across Firm Boundaries , 2005 .

[45]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  The Timeless Way of Building , 1979 .

[46]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Marta Fehér,et al.  The essential tension , 1990 .

[48]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[49]  E. Jantsch.  The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[50]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[51]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Design Research in the Technology of Information Systems: Truth or Dare , 2002 .

[52]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .