Experimental Validation of Anti-Collision Protocols for RFID Sensor Networks

Currently, there is an increasing interest in the use of RFID systems with passive or battery-less tags with sensors incorporated, also known as computational RFID (CRFID) systems. These passive tags use the reader signal to power up their microcontroller and an attached sensor. Following the current standard EPC C1G2, the reader must identify the tag (receive the tag’s identification code) prior to receive data from its sensor. In a typical RFID scenario, several sensor tags share the reader interrogation zone, and during their identification process, their responses often collide, increasing their identification time. Therefore, RFID application developers must be mindful of tag anti-collision protocols when dealing with CRFID tags in dense RFID sensor networks. So far, significant effort has been invested in simulation-based analysis of the performance of anti-collision protocols regarding the tags identification time. However, no one has explored the experimental performance of anti-collision protocols in an RFID sensor network using CRFID. This paper: (i) demonstrates that the impact of one tag identification time over the total time required to read one sensor data from that same tag is very significant, and (ii) presents an UHF-SDR RFID system which validates the improvement of FuzzyQ, a fast anticollision protocol, in relation to the protocol used in the current RFID standard.

[1]  Robert Langwieser,et al.  RFID Reader Receivers for Physical Layer Collision Recovery , 2010, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  Raimir Holanda Filho,et al.  A framework for enhancing the performance of Internet of Things applications based on RFID and WSNs , 2018, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[3]  Ying Chen,et al.  Study on Anti-collision Q Algorithm for UHF RFID , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing.

[4]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Fast downstream to many (computational) RFIDs , 2017, IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  Aggelos Bletsas,et al.  Fully-Coherent Reader With Commodity SDR for Gen2 FM0 and Computational RFID , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[6]  Asier Perallos,et al.  An Energy and Identification Time Decreasing Procedure for Memoryless RFID Tag Anticollision Protocols , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Asier Perallos,et al.  Fast fuzzy anti-collision protocol for the RFID standard EPC Gen-2 , 2016 .

[8]  Kwan-Wu Chin,et al.  A Survey and Tutorial of RFID Anti-Collision Protocols , 2010, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Yvonne Schuhmacher,et al.  Rfid Handbook Fundamentals And Applications In Contactless Smart Cards And Identification , 2016 .

[10]  Alanson P. Sample,et al.  Design of an RFID-Based Battery-Free Programmable Sensing Platform , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Petar Solic,et al.  Comparing Theoretical and Experimental Results in Gen2 RFID Throughput , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.