Threshold Analysis Using Diagnostic Tests with Multiple Results

Clinical problems represented by decision trees can be analyzed in terms of the probability threshold model, which provides management recommendations based on the prior prob ability of disease, the test threshold, and the test-treatment threshold. As originally proposed, the threshold model assumes that diagnostic tests provide information about a single event that is relevant to the decision. For some problems, however, a diagnostic test may provide information about more than one such event (e.g., a computed tomography [CT] scan gives information about both mediastinal and hilar metastases in lung cancer). The authors extend the probability threshold model to cases in which a single test provides information about two events that are relevant to the decision. They derive four thresholds that determine the best strategy for any combination of test results. The approach is illustrated for the decision to use a CT scan to stage lung cancer. The analysis reveals that: 1) the range of prior probabilities for which testing is optimal increases; 2) for some prior probabilities only test results about one event are important; 3) for some prior probabilities test results about both events are important; and 4) failure to account fully for information provided by a test can lead to erroneous test and treatment recommendations. Key words: decision theory; Bayes theorem; decision making, computer-assisted; decision support technics; predictive value of tests; lung neoplasms; probability threshold; decision analysis. (Med Decis Making 1989;9:91- 103)

[1]  J. Kassirer,et al.  The threshold approach to clinical decision making. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  P Doubilet,et al.  A Mathematical Approach to Interpretation and Selection of Diagnostic Tests , 1983, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  J. Kassirer,et al.  Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J C Hershey,et al.  Clinical Guidelines for Using Two Dichotomous Tests , 1986, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  P Glasziou,et al.  Threshold Analysis of Decision Tables , 1986, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  N. Martini,et al.  Prospective study of 445 lung carcinomas with mediastinal lymph node metastases. , 1980, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  Jørgen Hilden Some Tricks and Tools for Intelligent Use of Multiple Tests , 1988 .

[8]  J. Hilden,et al.  Decision Tables and logic in Decision Analysis , 1986, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  R. Ginsberg,et al.  Modern thirty-day operative mortality for surgical resections in lung cancer. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  The Importance of considering single Testing When Two Tests Are Available , 1987, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  S. Inouye,et al.  Standard and computed tomography in the evaluation of neoplasms of the chest. A comparative efficacy assessment. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  J. Smart,et al.  Radiotherapy of cancer of the lung; results in a selected group of cases. , 1956, Lancet.

[13]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Optimal Selection of a Battery of Tests , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.