The shape of collaborations

The structure of scientific collaborations has been the object of intense study both for its importance for innovation and scientific advancement, and as a model system for social group coordination and formation thanks to the availability of authorship data. Over the last years, complex networks approach to this problem have yielded important insights and shaped our understanding of scientific communities. In this paper we propose to complement the picture provided by network tools with that coming from using simplicial descriptions of publications and the corresponding topological methods. We show that it is natural to extend the concept of triadic closure to simplicial complexes and show the presence of strong simplicial closure. Focusing on the differences between scientific fields, we find that, while categories are characterized by different collaboration size distributions, the distributions of how many collaborations to which an author is able to participate is conserved across fields pointing to underlying attentional and temporal constraints. We then show that homological cycles, that can intuitively be thought as hole in the network fabric, are an important part of the underlying community linking structure.

[1]  R. Ponds,et al.  The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration , 2009 .

[2]  Andrea Lancichinetti,et al.  Detecting the overlapping and hierarchical community structure in complex networks , 2008, 0802.1218.

[3]  Alice Patania,et al.  Topological analysis of data , 2017, EPJ Data Science.

[4]  R. Ho.  Algebraic Topology , 2022 .

[5]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Extracting the hierarchical organization of complex systems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  C. J. Carstens,et al.  Persistent Homology of Collaboration Networks , 2013 .

[7]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[8]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  The strength of strong ties in scientific collaboration networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[9]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Control Principles of Complex Networks , 2015, ArXiv.

[10]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.

[11]  B. L. Clarke,et al.  Communication patterns of biomedical scientists. I. Multiple authorship and sponsorship of Federal Program volunteer papers. , 1967, Federation proceedings.

[12]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Clique percolation in random networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[14]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Emergent Complex Network Geometry , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Xingyi Zhang,et al.  Overlapping Community Detection based on Network Decomposition , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Jianhua Lin,et al.  Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy , 1991, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  G. Bianconi,et al.  Complex quantum network geometries: Evolution and phase transitions. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Ralph Kenna,et al.  Managing research quality: critical mass and optimal academic research group size , 2012 .

[20]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[21]  Owen T. Courtney,et al.  Weighted growing simplicial complexes. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[22]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Growing through copying: the negative consequences of innovation on franchise network growth , 2009 .

[23]  B. L. Clarke.  Multiple Authorship Trends in Scientific Papers , 1964, Science.

[24]  Francesco Vaccarino,et al.  Topological Strata of Weighted Complex Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[26]  Primoz Skraba,et al.  Topology, Big Data and Optimization , 2016 .

[27]  Weimao Ke,et al.  Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams , 2005, Complex..

[28]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists' productivity , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[29]  M. Coccia,et al.  Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[31]  Jean-Gabriel Young,et al.  Construction of and efficient sampling from the simplicial configuration model. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[32]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[33]  Dmitriy Morozov,et al.  Zigzag persistent homology and real-valued functions , 2009, SCG '09.

[34]  Afra Zomorodian,et al.  The tidy set: a minimal simplicial set for computing homology of clique complexes , 2010, SCG.

[35]  S. Redner,et al.  Network growth by copying. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  R. Ghrist.  Barcodes: The persistent topology of data , 2007 .

[37]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  Weixiong Zhang,et al.  Identifying network communities with a high resolution. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  W. Deming,et al.  Persistent Homology ? , 2013 .

[43]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Evolution and structure of sustainability science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Simplifying the homology of networks via strong collapses , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[45]  S. Weinberger.  Persistent Homology , 2019, Brain Network Analysis.

[46]  Raj Kumar,et al.  The strength of strong ties in scientific collaboration networks , 2012 .

[47]  Katy Börner,et al.  A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[48]  Clarke Bl,et al.  Communication patterns of biomedical scientists. I. Multiple authorship and sponsorship of Federal Program volunteer papers. , 1967 .

[49]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[50]  Ralph Kenna,et al.  Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size , 2010, Scientometrics.

[51]  G. Petri,et al.  Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.