Basic Framework for Games with Quantum-like Players

We develop a framework for the analysis of strategic interactions under the constructive preference perspective a la Kahneman and Tversky formalized in the Type Indeterminacy model. The players are modeled as systems subject to measurements and characterized by quantum-like uncertain preferences. The decision nodes are modeled as, possibly non-commuting, operators that measure preferences modulo strategic reasoning. We define a Hilbert space of types spanned by the players' eigentypes representing their potential preferences in different situations. We focus on pure strategy TI games of maximal information where all uncertainty stems from the intrinsic indeterminacy of preferences. We show that preferences evolve in a non-deterministic manner with actions along the play: they are endogenous to the interaction. We propose the notion of cashing-on-the-go to compute a player's utility, and the Type Indeterminate Nash Equilibrium as a solution concept relying on best-replies at the level of the eigentypes. We illustrate an example exhibiting the phenomenon of the manipulation of rivals' preferences.

[1]  N. Bohr,et al.  On the notions of causality and complementarity. , 1950, Science.

[2]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Welfare Economics of Variable Tastes , 1953 .

[3]  W. Heisenberg,et al.  La nature dans la physique contemporaine , 1962 .

[4]  B. Peleg,et al.  On the Existence of a Consistent Course of Action when Tastes are Changing , 1973 .

[5]  Michael Maschler,et al.  Credible Equilibria in Games with Utilities Changing during the Play , 1995 .

[6]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9806088.

[7]  David Deutsch Quantum theory of probability and decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[9]  Pierfrancesco La Mura Correlated Equilibria of Classical Strategic Games with Quantum Signals , 2003, ArXiv.

[10]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[11]  David K. Levine,et al.  Quantum Games Have No News For Economics , 2005 .

[12]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility , 2005 .

[13]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[14]  Shmuel Zamir,et al.  Type Indeterminacy: A Model for the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-Man , 2006, physics/0604166.

[15]  G. Loewenstein Exotic Preferences: Behavioral Economics and Human Motivation , 2007 .

[16]  Riccardo Franco,et al.  The conjunction fallacy and interference effects , 2007, 0708.3948.

[17]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Quantum Information Processing Explanation for Interactions between Inferences and Decisions , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Quantum Interaction.

[18]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Distinguishing Quantum and Markov models of human decision-making , 2008 .

[19]  Pierfrancesco La Mura Projective expected utility: a subjective formulation , 2008, TARK '09.

[20]  Michel Bitbol Théorie quantique et sciences humaines , 2009 .

[21]  Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky Endogenous Preferences in Games with Type Indeterminate Players , 2010, AAAI Fall Symposium: Quantum Informatics for Cognitive, Social, and Semantic Processes.

[22]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[23]  V. I. Danilov,et al.  Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty , 2010 .

[24]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  The relationship between quantum and classical correlation in games , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[25]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Type Indeterminacy in Dynamic Decision-Making: Self-Control through Identity Management , 2012, Games.

[26]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[27]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[28]  Peter D. Kvam,et al.  An Empirical Test of Type-Indeterminacy in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 2013, QI.