Effect of Terrestrial LiDAR Point Sampling Density in Ephemeral Gully Characterization

Gully erosion can account for significant volumes of sediment exiting agricultural landscapes, but is difficult to monitor and quantify its evolution with traditional surveying technology. Scientific investigations of gullies depend on accurate and detailed topographic information to understand and evaluate the complex interactions between field topography and gully evolution. Detailed terrain representations can be produced by new technologies such as terrestrial LiDAR systems. These systems are capable of collecting information with a wide range of ground point sampling densities as a result of operator controlled factors. Increasing point density results in richer datasets at a cost of increased time needed to complete field surveys. In large research watersheds, with hundreds of sites being monitored, data collection can become costly and time consuming. In this study, the effect of point sampling density on the capability to collect topographic information was investigated at individual gully scale. This was performed through the utilization of semi-variograms to produce overall guiding principles for multi-temporal gully surveys based on various levels of laser sampling points and relief variation (low, moderate, and high). Results indicated the existence of a point sampling density threshold that produces little or no additional topographic information when exceeded. A reduced dataset was created using the density thresholds and compared to the original dataset with no major discrepancy. Although variations in relief and soil roughness can lead to different point sampling density requirements, the outcome of this study serves as practical guidance for future field surveys of gully evolution and erosion.

[1]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Automated mapping of potential for ephemeral gully formation in agricultural watersheds , 2010 .

[2]  Q. Guo,et al.  Effects of Topographic Variability and Lidar Sampling Density on Several DEM Interpolation Methods , 2010 .

[3]  G. Asner,et al.  Comparison of gully erosion estimates using airborne and ground-based LiDAR on Santa Cruz Island, California , 2010 .

[4]  R. L. Bingner,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF GULLY EROSION COMPONENTS WITHIN THE USDA ANNAGNPS WATERSHED MODEL FOR PRECISION CONSERVATION , 2010 .

[5]  J. Roering,et al.  Using DInSAR, airborne LiDAR, and archival air photos to quantify landsliding and sediment transport , 2009 .

[6]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Incidence angle influence on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2009 .

[7]  Guohe Huang,et al.  A study on DEM-derived primary topographic attributes for hydrologic applications: Sensitivity to elevation data resolution , 2008 .

[8]  Evaluation of Terrestrial LIDAR for Monitoring Geomorphic Change at Archeological Sites in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona , 2008 .

[9]  L. Allan James,et al.  Using LiDAR data to map gullies and headwater streams under forest canopy: South Carolina, USA , 2007 .

[10]  E. Passos,et al.  MODELAGEM DE CANAIS INCISIVOS - REVISÃO , 2004 .

[11]  T. Schmid,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN EROSION RESEARCH: CALCULATION OF ROUGHNESS AND VOLUME BALANCE AT A LOGGED FOREST SITE , 2004 .

[12]  Y. Tseng,et al.  Change Detection of Landslide Terrains Using Ground-based Lidar Data , 2004 .

[13]  Veronique Souchere,et al.  Incorporating soil surface crusting processes in an expert-based runoff model: Sealing and Transfer by Runoff and Erosion related to Agricultural Management , 2002 .

[14]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[15]  Javier Casalí,et al.  Ephemeral gully erosion in southern Navarra (Spain) , 1999 .

[16]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Geostatistics and remote sensing , 1998 .

[17]  P. K. Kitanidis,et al.  Introduction to Geostatistics: Index , 1997 .

[18]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[19]  G. R. Foster,et al.  RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation , 1991 .

[20]  D. Woodward,et al.  Method to predict cropland ephemeral gully erosion , 1999 .

[21]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing. I - Scene models and simulated images. II - Real digital images , 1988 .

[22]  Gérard Mégie,et al.  Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Applications , 1985 .

[23]  L. Lane,et al.  Estimating sediment yield from rangeland with CREAMS a field-scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems , 1982 .

[24]  I. Gibson Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology , 1976, Mineralogical Magazine.

[25]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[26]  G. G. Pohlman Soil Science Society of America , 1940 .

[27]  C. F. Shaw A Glossary of Soil Terms , 1928 .