A Model of Human Behavior in Coalition Formation Games

Coalition formation is a type of mixed-motive game in which n players strategically negotiate to secure positions in advantageous contracts. In this study, we find that systems of agents which learn by a simple linear updating rule successfully can model the outcomes of human players across five coalition formation games studied experimentally by Kahan and Rapoport (1974). “Greedy” agents, which are deterministic and maximizing in their selection of whom to offer to, achieve outcomes on par with humans within a few hundred trials. In comparison, “Matching” agents which use probability matching for selecting whom to offer to achieve overall outcomes qualitatively similar to those of humans, but not as closely as the Greedy agents do.

[1]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Experience‐weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games , 1999 .

[2]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Learning and Decision Costs in Experimental Constant Sum Games , 1997 .

[3]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  Bargaining in a Three-Agent CoalitionS Game: An Application of Genetic Programming , 1995 .

[4]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[5]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[6]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Descriptive Theories of Bargaining , 1990 .

[8]  R. Aumann,et al.  THE BARGAINING SET FOR COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1961 .

[9]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Choice and Learning under Uncertainty: A Case Study in Baseball Batting , 2003 .

[10]  M. Macy,et al.  Learning dynamics in social dilemmas , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Roth,et al.  Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term* , 1995 .

[12]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Test of The Bargaining Set and Kernel Models in Three-Person Games , 1990 .

[13]  Garett O. Dworman,et al.  On automated discovery of models using genetic programming in game-theoretic contexts , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Models of Two-person Games in ACT-R and SOAR , 2001 .

[15]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  Theories of Coalition Formation , 1998 .

[16]  Garett O. Dworman,et al.  On Automated Discovery of Models Using Genetic Programming: Bargaining in a Three-Agent Coalitions Game , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  Bargaining by artificial agents in two coalition games: a study in genetic programming for electronic commerce , 1996 .

[18]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[19]  A. Roth,et al.  Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria , 1998 .

[20]  D. Kirsh,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2003 .