Nonparametric regression sinogram smoothing using a roughness-penalized Poisson likelihood objective function

The authors develop and investigate an approach to tomographic image reconstruction in which nonparametric regression using a roughness-penalized Poisson likelihood objective function is used to smooth each projection independently prior to reconstruction by unapodized filtered backprojection (FBP). As an added generalization, the roughness penalty is expressed in terms of a monotonic transform, known as the link function, of the projections. The approach is compared to shift-invariant projection filtering through the use of a Hanning window as well as to a related nonparametric regression approach that makes use of an objective function based on weighted least squares (WLS) rather than the Poisson likelihood. The approach is found to lead to improvements in resolution-noise tradeoffs over the Hanning filter as well as over the WLS approach. The authors also investigate the resolution and noise effects of three different link functions: the identity, square root, and logarithm links. The choice of link function is found to influence the resolution uniformity and isotropy properties of the reconstructed images. In particular, in the case of an idealized imaging system with intrinsically uniform and isotropic resolution, the choice of a square root link function yields the desirable outcome of essentially uniform and isotropic resolution in reconstructed images, with noise performance still superior to that of the Hanning filter as well as that of the WLS approach.

[1]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[2]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Jean-Pierre V. Guédon,et al.  Bandlimited and Haar filtered back-projection reconstructions , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  S. I. Grossman Multivariable Calculus, Linear Algebra and Differential Equations , 1982 .

[5]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Tomographic Reconstruction Using Information-Weighted Spline Smoothing , 1993, IPMI.

[7]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Ideal-observer analysis of lesion detectability in planar, conventional SPECT, and dedicated SPECT scintimammography using effective multi-dimensional smoothing , 1998 .

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  B. Silverman,et al.  Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models , 1994 .

[11]  S. Deans The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications , 1983 .

[12]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  A fast projector-backprojector pair modeling the asymmetric, spatially varying scatter response function for scatter compensation in SPECT imaging , 1993 .

[13]  I Buvat,et al.  A spline-regularized minimal residual algorithm for iterative attenuation correction in SPECT. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  I Buvat,et al.  Two-dimensional statistical model for regularized backprojection in SPECT. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Few-View Tomography Using Roughncss-l'enalized Nonparamctric Kegrcssion and Periodic Spline Interpolation , 1999 .

[16]  Yves J. Bizais,et al.  Statistical model for tomographic reconstruction methods using spline functions , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[17]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Regularization for uniform spatial resolution properties in penalized-likelihood image reconstruction , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  A unified analysis of exact methods of inverting the 2-D exponential radon transform, with implications for noise control in SPECT , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Digital Picture Processing , 1976 .

[21]  Charles E. Metz,et al.  Non-iterative methods and their noise characteristics in 2D SPECT image reconstruction , 1997 .

[22]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Penalized-likelihood estimators and noise analysis for randoms-precorrected PET transmission scans , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[24]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.