Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains

SummaryToday's theories and models on innovation stress the importance of scientific capabilities and science-technology proximity, especially in new emerging fields of economic activity. Inthis contribution we examine the relationship between national scientific capabilities, the science intensity of technology and technological performance within six emergent industrial fields. Our findings reveal that national technological performance is positively associated with scientific capabilities. Countries performing better on a technological level are characterized both by larger numbers of publications and by numbers of involved institutions that exceed average expected values. The latter observation holds for both companies and knowledge generating institutes actively involved in scientific activities. As such, our findings seem to suggest beneficial effects of scientific capabilities shouldered by a multitude of organizations. In addition, higher numbers of patent activity coincide with higher levels of science intensity pointing out the relevance of science 'proximity' when developing technology in newer, emerging fields. Limitations and directions for further research are discussed.

[1]  R. Tijssen.  Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors , 2002 .

[2]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Indicators and the relations between science and technology , 2006, Scientometrics.

[3]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[4]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[5]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data , 2003 .

[6]  Jorge Niosi,et al.  The Competencies of Regions – Canada's Clusters in Biotechnology , 2001 .

[7]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[8]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2014 .

[9]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[10]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria , 2003 .

[11]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors , 2003, Scientometrics.

[12]  M. Reitzig.  Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .

[13]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[14]  David A. Johnston,et al.  Organisational knowledge creating processes and the performance of university-industry collaborative R&D projects , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[15]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? , 2004, Scientometrics.

[16]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Patent Citations in a Novel Field of Technology — What Can They Tell about Interactions between Emerging Communities of Science and Technology? , 2000, Scientometrics.

[17]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge?: Global trends in the output of corporate research articles , 2004 .

[18]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences , 1999 .

[19]  E. Wasserman.  Basic research and industrial innovation , 1983 .

[20]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Basic Research and Industrial Innovation , 1995 .

[21]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[22]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities , 1998 .

[23]  R. Tijssen.  Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .

[24]  M. Meyer.  Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[25]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[26]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Patent Related Indicators for Assessing Knowledge-Generating Institutions: Towards a Contextualised Approach , 2003 .

[27]  P. David,et al.  The research network and the new economics of science: from metaphors to organisational behaviours , 1998 .