Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage

Biphasic creep indentation methodology and an automated indentation apparatus were used to measure the aggregate modulus, Poisson's ratio, permeability, thickness, creep and recovery equilibrium times, and percentage of recovery of normal articular cartilage in 10 human hip joints. These properties were mapped regionally to examine the mechanical factors involved in the development of site‐specific degenerative lesions in the acetabulum and femoral head. The results indicate that there are significant differences between these properties regionally in the acetabulum and femoral head and between the two anatomical structures. Specifically, it was found that cartilage in the superomedial aspect of the femoral head has a 41% larger aggregate modulus than its anatomically corresponding articulating surface in the acetabulum. In addition, the supermedial aspect of the femoral head has the greates aggregate modulus (1.816 MPa) within the hip joint. During sitting, the inferior portion of the femoral head is in contact with the anterior acetabulum, and the anterior acetabulum has a 53% greater aggregate modulus than the inferior femoral head. This area below the fovea on the femoral head has the least aggregate modulus (0.814 MPa) within the hip joint. These mismatches in the compressive modulus of opposing articulating surfaces may contribute to degeneration of cartilage in the superomedial acetabulum and the inferior femoral head. Our findings support the clinical observation that these areas are frequent sites of early degeneration.

[1]  R W Mann,et al.  Influence of cartilage geometry on the pressure distribution in the human hip joint. , 1979, Science.

[2]  P. Byers,et al.  A post mortem study of the hip joint. Including the prevalence of the features of the right side. , 1970, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Primary osteoarthritis: epidemiology, clinical aspects, and general management. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[4]  P D Byers,et al.  Articular cartilage changes in Caucasian and Asian hip joints. , 1974, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  W. Simon.  Scale effects in animal joints. II. Thickness and elasticity in the deformability of articular cartilage. , 1971, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  B. Ansell.  Early studies of 198Au in the treatment of synovitis of the knee. , 1973, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  R W Mann,et al.  Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  P. Bullough,et al.  The distribution of collagen in human articular cartilage with some of its physiological implications. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  B. Weightman,et al.  Mechanical and biochemical properties of human articular cartilage in osteoarthritic femoral heads and in autopsy specimens. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  A S Greenwald,et al.  The transmission of load through the human hip joint. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Incongruent Surfaces in the Human Hip Joint , 1968, Nature.

[13]  J. Lewis,et al.  Osteoarthrotic changes after acute transarticular load. An animal model. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  M. Freeman,et al.  Patterns of cartilage stiffness on normal and degenerate human femoral heads. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  I. Macnab,et al.  The microhardness of articular cartilage. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  V C Mow,et al.  Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  G E Kempson,et al.  The tensile properties of the cartilage of human femoral condyles related to the content of collagen and glycosaminoglycans. , 1973, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  W H Simon,et al.  Scale effects in animal joints. I. Articular cartilage thickness and compressive stress. , 1970, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  W M Lai,et al.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  G. Meachim,et al.  Cartilage fibrillation in shoulder and hip joints in Liverpool necropsies. , 1973, Journal of anatomy.

[21]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Sex differences in the skeletal geometry of the human pelvis and hip joint. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  P. Bullough,et al.  Permeability of articular cartilage. , 1968, Nature.

[23]  A S Greenwald,et al.  Weight-bearing areas in the human hip joint. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  T D Brown,et al.  In vitro contact stress distributions in the natural human hip. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  W C Hutton,et al.  Contact pressures in the human hip joint. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  J. O'Connor,et al.  The relationship between degenerative changes and load-bearing in the human hip. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Cartilage of the hip joint. Topographical variation of glycosaminoglycan content in normal and fibrillated tissue. , 1973, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[29]  E Hierholzer,et al.  Stress on the articular surface of the hip joint in healthy adults and persons with idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip joint. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  C. Armstrong,et al.  In vitro measurement of articular cartilage deformations in the intact human hip joint under load. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  G. Meachim.  Light microscopy of Indian ink preparations of fibrillated cartilage. , 1972, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

[32]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--I. Theoretical analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  B. Weightman,et al.  Mechanical and biochemical properties of human articular cartilage from the femoral head after subcapital fracture. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  L. Mockros,et al.  Indentation tests of human articular cartilage. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Topographical Variation of Glycosaminoglycan Content in Normal and Fibrillated Tissue , 2022 .

[36]  M. Freeman,et al.  The determination of a creep modulus for articular cartilage from indentation tests of the human femoral head. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  J TRUETA,et al.  Osteoarthritis of the hip: a study of the nature and evolution of the disease. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[38]  G E Kempson,et al.  Mechanical properties of articular cartilage. , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  P. D. Rushfeldt,et al.  Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum--I. Ultrasonic measurement of acetabular surfaces, sphericity and cartilage thickness. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  G. Meachim.  Articular cartilage lesions in osteo‐arthritis of the femoral head , 1972, The Journal of pathology.

[41]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.