An Augmented Reality Environment to Provide Visual Feedback to Amputees During sEMG Data Acquisitions

Myoelectric hand prostheses have the potential to improve the quality of life of hand amputees. Still, the rejection rate of functional prostheses in the adult population is high. One of the causes is the long time for fitting the prosthesis and the lack of feedback during training. Moreover, prosthesis control is often unnatural and requires mental effort during the training. Virtual and augmented reality devices can help to improve these difficulties and reduce phantom limb pain. Amputees can start training the residual limb muscles with a weightless virtual hand earlier than possible with a real prosthesis. When activating the muscles related to a specific grasp, the subjects receive a visual feedback from the virtual hand. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents one of the first portable augmented reality environment for transradial amputees that combines two devices available on the market: the Microsoft HoloLens and the Thalmic labs Myo. In the augmented environment, rendered by the HoloLens, the user can control a virtual hand with surface electromyography. By using the virtual hand, the user can move objects in augmented reality and train to activate the right muscles for each movement through visual feedback. The environment presented represents a resource for rehabilitation and for scientists. It helps hand amputees to train using prosthetic hands right after the surgery. Scientists can use the environment to develop real time control experiments, without the logistical disadvantages related to dealing with a real prosthetic hand but with the advantages of a realistic visual feedback.

[1]  R. Roeschlein,et al.  Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use , 1989, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[2]  D. Silcox,et al.  Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  E. L. Morin,et al.  A myoelectric control evaluation and trainer system , 1994 .

[4]  J. Davidson A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[5]  Alcimar Soares,et al.  The Development of a Virtual Myoelectric Prosthesis Controlled by an EMG Pattern Recognition System Based on Neural Networks , 2004, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[6]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Manipulation Practice for Upper-Limb Amputees Using Virtual Reality , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  A Training System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand in Virtual Environment , 2007, 2007 IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[9]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Fine detection of grasp force and posture by amputees via surface electromyography , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[11]  Alexandre Cardoso,et al.  On the use of Virtual and Augmented Reality for upper limb prostheses training and simulation , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[12]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  C. Jang,et al.  A Survey on Activities of Daily Living and Occupations of Upper Extremity Amputees , 2011, Annals of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  M Controzzi,et al.  Online Myoelectric Control of a Dexterous Hand Prosthesis by Transradial Amputees , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Grasp Frequency and Usage in Daily Household and Machine Shop Tasks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[16]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Augmented reality improves myoelectric prosthesis training , 2014 .

[17]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Classification of hand movements in amputated subjects by sEMG and accelerometers , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Control Capabilities of Myoelectric Robotic Prostheses by Hand Amputees: A Scientific Research and Market Overview , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[20]  A. M. Hager,et al.  Effect of clinical parameters on the control of myoelectric robotic prosthetic hands. , 2016, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  A. Stockselius,et al.  Phantom motor execution facilitated by machine learning and augmented reality as treatment for phantom limb pain: a single group, clinical trial in patients with chronic intractable phantom limb pain , 2016, The Lancet.

[22]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks , 2017, PloS one.

[23]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Repeatability of grasp recognition for robotic hand prosthesis control based on sEMG data , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[24]  Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako,et al.  Evaluation of the Myo armband for the classification of hand motions , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[25]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Hand Gesture Classification in Transradial Amputees Using the Myo Armband Classifier* This work was partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Sinergia project # 410160837 MeganePro. , 2018, 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob).