Cardiovascular Outcomes with Once-Weekly GLP-1 RAs: Clinical and Economic Implications

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) disease, which is the largest contributor to the economic burden of diabetes. Minimization of disease morbidity through comprehensive management of ASCVD risk factors, including but not limited to hyperglycemia, is a key goal of T2DM therapy. Emerging evidence with some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) points to beneficial effects across a range of atherosclerotic risk factors and possible improvement of some cardiovascular outcomes independent of these effects. Given these benefits, there has been substantial interest in evaluating the cardiovascular safety of GLP-1 RAs as well as their potential to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Following the superior clinical outcome with the once-daily GLP-1 RA liraglutide (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of cardiovascular outcome Results [LEADER]), this review examines and summarizes the effects of once-weekly GLP-1 RAs, including exenatide extended release (ER), dulaglutide, and semaglutide, on reducing cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM. A phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes trial (EXSCEL) of exenatide ER found no significant difference between exenatide ER and placebo in reducing MACE in patients with T2DM. In a phase 3 premarketing trial in T2DM patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (SUSTAIN-6), semaglutide significantly reduced the risks of MACE and non-fatal stroke compared with placebo. A phase 3 study (REWIND) is underway to evaluate the effects of dulaglutide on MACE. Considering the substantial costs of cardiovascular disease in patients with T2DM, it will be of interest to assess the impact of treatment with once-weekly GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular disease-related costs among patients with T2DM.

[1]  É. Hardy,et al.  DURATION-8 Randomized Controlled Trial 104-Week Results—Once-Weekly Exenatide (ExQW) plus Once-Daily Dapagliflozin (DAPA) vs. ExQW or DAPA Alone , 2018, Diabetes.

[2]  A. Barry,et al.  Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on All-cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. , 2018, Current diabetes reviews.

[3]  J. Rosenstock,et al.  Effect of exenatide QW or placebo, both added to titrated insulin glargine, in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: The DURATION‐7 randomized study , 2018, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[4]  Irl B Hirsch,et al.  AACE/ACE Consensus Statement CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM – 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY , 2018 .

[5]  G. Dagenais,et al.  Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the Researching cardiovascular Events with a Weekly INcretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial on the cardiovascular effects of dulaglutide , 2018, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[6]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[7]  L. Lund,et al.  Efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists on macrovascular and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. , 2017, Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD.

[8]  Neha J. Pagidipati,et al.  Effects of Once‐Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  B. Cheung,et al.  Network meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes in randomized controlled trials of new antidiabetic drugs. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[10]  G. Sesti,et al.  Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on mortality and cardiovascular events: A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  K. Fitch,et al.  Cardiovascular event incidence and cost in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Medicare claims-based actuarial analysis , 2017, Current medical research and opinion.

[12]  M. Davies,et al.  Placebo‐controlled, randomized trial of the addition of once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist dulaglutide to titrated daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD‐9) , 2017, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[13]  E. Wittbrodt,et al.  Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review of comparative effectiveness research , 2017, Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy.

[14]  S. Bain,et al.  Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[15]  Dong Yun Lee,et al.  Glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes , 2017, Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism.

[16]  Qinghua Wang,et al.  Cardiovascular Benefits of Native GLP-1 and its Metabolites: An Indicator for GLP-1-Therapy Strategies , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[17]  T. Vilsbøll,et al.  Cardiovascular safety and benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists , 2017, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[18]  Laura Lovato,et al.  Effects of High Density Lipoprotein Raising Therapies on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, with or without Renal Impairment: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study , 2016, American Journal of Nephrology.

[19]  É. Hardy,et al.  Exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin once daily versus exenatide or dapagliflozin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (DURATION-8): a 28 week, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. , 2016, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[20]  R. Henry,et al.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly Over 6 Years in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Uncontrolled Open-Label Extension of the DURATION-1 Study , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[21]  H. Rodbard,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-Weekly vs. Placebo as Add-on to Basal Insulin Alone or in Combination with Metformin in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 5) , 2016 .

[22]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  P. Sager,et al.  Cardiovascular safety for once-weekly dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes: a pre-specified meta-analysis of prospectively adjudicated cardiovascular events , 2016, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[24]  Honghua H. Jiang,et al.  A 24‐week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once‐weekly dulaglutide added on to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (AWARD‐8) , 2016, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[25]  S. Solomon,et al.  Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Jennifer S. Korsnes,et al.  Health care resource utilization and costs associated with nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events. , 2015, Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy.

[27]  David M. Smith,et al.  Cardiovascular event costs in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2015, Journal of medical economics.

[28]  F. Giorgino,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2) , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[29]  L. Blonde,et al.  Once-weekly dulaglutide versus bedtime insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study , 2015, The Lancet.

[30]  G. Umpierrez,et al.  Safety and efficacy of once‐weekly dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 2 years in metformin‐treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD‐5): a randomized, phase III study , 2015, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[31]  M. Trautmann,et al.  Five-year efficacy and safety data of exenatide once weekly: long-term results from the DURATION-1 randomized clinical trial. , 2015, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[32]  J. Fahrbach,et al.  Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[33]  G. Colon,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Added Onto Pioglitazone and Metformin Versus Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-1) , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[34]  G. Umpierrez,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Monotherapy Versus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-3) , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[35]  G. Umpierrez,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Versus Sitagliptin After 52 Weeks in Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-5) , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[36]  Luc Van Gaal,et al.  Exenatide once weekly versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes (DURATION-3): 3-year results of an open-label randomised trial. , 2014, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[37]  D. Drucker,et al.  Cardiovascular actions of incretin-based therapies. , 2014, Circulation research.

[38]  L. Vo,et al.  Direct medical costs of complications of diabetes in the United States: estimates for event-year and annual state costs (USD 2012) , 2014, Journal of medical economics.

[39]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Medical costs associated with type 2 diabetes complications and comorbidities. , 2013, The American journal of managed care.

[40]  D. Maggs,et al.  Exenatide once weekly: sustained improvement in glycemic control and cardiometabolic measures through 3 years , 2013, Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy.

[41]  W. Sheu,et al.  Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study , 2013, The Lancet.

[42]  M. Trautmann,et al.  DURATION-5: exenatide once weekly resulted in greater improvements in glycemic control compared with exenatide twice daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2011, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[43]  R. Bergenstal,et al.  Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[44]  J. Northrup,et al.  Once weekly exenatide compared with insulin glargine titrated to target in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-3): an open-label randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[45]  R. Straka,et al.  Incremental cardiovascular costs and resource use associated with diabetes: an assessment of 29,863 patients in the US managed-care setting , 2009, Cardiovascular diabetology.

[46]  M. Hanefeld,et al.  Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[47]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  R. Holman,et al.  10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[49]  D. Drucker,et al.  Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study , 2008, The Lancet.

[50]  S. Nissen,et al.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  J. Egan,et al.  Mechanisms of action of glucagon-like peptide 1 in the pancreas. , 2007, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[52]  Oluf Pedersen,et al.  Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[54]  F. Porzsolt,et al.  Using machine learning to predict laboratory test results , 2016, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[55]  S. Schinner Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes , 2009 .

[56]  S. Schinner Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes , 2009 .

[57]  J. Bigger,et al.  Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group , 2008 .