Variation of system performance, quality control standards and adherence to international FDG-PET/CT imaging guidelines

AIM To gather information on clinical operations, quality control (QC) standards and adoption of guidelines for FDG-PET/CT imaging in Austrian PET/CT centres. METHODS A written survey composed of 68 questions related to A) PET/CT centre and installation, B) standard protocol parameters for FDG-PET/CT imaging of oncology patients, and C) standard QC procedures was conducted between November and December 2013 among all Austrian PET/CT centres. In addition, a NEMA-NU2 2012 image quality phantom test was performed using standard whole-body imaging settings on all PET/CT systems with a lesion-to-background ratio of 4. Recovery coefficients (RC) were calculated for each lesion and PET/CT system. RESULTS A) 13 PET/CT systems were installed in 12 nuclear medicine departments at public hospitals. B) Average fasting prior to FDG-PET/CT was 7.6 (4-12) h. All sites measured blood glucose levels while using different cut-off levels (64%: 150 mg/dl). Weight-based activity injection was performed at 83% sites with a mean FDG activity of 4.1 MBq/kg. Average FDG uptake time was 55 (45-75) min. All sites employed CT contrast agents (variation from 1%-95% of the patients). All sites reported SUV-max. C) Frequency of QC tests varied significantly and QC phantom measurements revealed significant differences in RCs. CONCLUSION Significant variations in FDG-PET/CT protocol parameters among all Austrian PET/CT users were observed. Subsequently, efforts need to be put in place to further standardize imaging protocols. At a minimum clinical PET/CT operations should ensure compliance with existing guidelines. Further, standardized QC procedures must be followed to improve quantitative accuracy across PET/CT centres.

[1]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  M C Gilardi,et al.  PET/CT in diagnostic oncology. , 2004, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[3]  Alan Britten,et al.  Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  T. Beyer,et al.  Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Xiaoyuan Chen,et al.  Positron emission tomography imaging of cancer biology: current status and future prospects. , 2011, Seminars in oncology.

[7]  R. Wahl,et al.  Variations in PET/CT Methodology for Oncologic Imaging at U.S. Academic Medical Centers: An Imaging Response Assessment Team Survey , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  C. Claussen,et al.  Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT with highly concentrated contrast agent can be used for PET attenuation correction in integrated PET/CT imaging , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Joel Karp,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  S. Holm,et al.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  Dietmar Georg,et al.  Einfluss der PET-Rekonstruktionsparameter auf den TrueX-Algorithmus , 2013 .

[13]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  J H Hendry,et al.  ICRP PUBLICATION 118: ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions and Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs — Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context , 2012, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  W. Oyen,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Noise Considerations for PET Quantification Using Maximum and Peak Standardized Uptake Value , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  N. Willich,et al.  FDG-PET/CT in oncology , 2007, Nuklearmedizin.

[18]  W. Oyen,et al.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  R. Boellaard Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Image reconstruction for PET/CT scanners: past achievements and future challenges. , 2010, Imaging in medicine.

[21]  Alan Britten,et al.  Acceptance testing for nuclear medicine instrumentation , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  Pat Zanzonico,et al.  Routine Quality Control of Clinical Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation: A Brief Review* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  T. Beyer,et al.  Variations in Clinical PET/CT Operations: Results of an International Survey of Active PET/CT Users , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  H Bergmann,et al.  Influence of PET reconstruction parameters on the TrueX algorithm. A combined phantom and patient study. , 2013, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.

[25]  R. Boellaard Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  N. Aide,et al.  Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  M. Reiser,et al.  White paper of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Society of Radiology (ESR) on multimodality imaging , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  M. Souvatzoglou,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT. , 2013, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.