Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

[1]  Thomas J. Ryan,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  F. Sonnenberg,et al.  Myocardial revascularization for chronic stable angina. Analysis of the role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty based on data available in 1989. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  R. Gunnar.  Decision analysis in the evaluation of revascularization. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[4]  E. Jones.  Multivessel coronary angioplasty. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Multivessel coronary angioplasty from 1980 to 1989: procedural results and long-term outcome. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  B. Gersh,et al.  Coronary angioplasty as the preferred approach to treatment of multivessel disease: promising, appealing but unproved. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  T. Ryan.  Validation of a method for estimating success and complication rates of multivessel angioplasty. A key to the future. , 1990, Circulation.

[8]  K. Bailey,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease: how important is complete revascularization for cardiac event-free survival? , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Webb,et al.  Bidirecctional crossover and late outcome after coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery: 8 to 11 year follow-up , 1990 .

[10]  J. Hoogsteen,et al.  Bilateral mammary artery surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease? An analysis of effects and costs. , 1989, European heart journal.

[11]  R. Henderson.  The Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial protocol: a long term study of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with angina. , 1989, British heart journal.

[12]  S. Ellis,et al.  Comparison of coronary angioplasty with medical treatment for single- and double-vessel coronary disease with left anterior descending coronary involvement: long-term outcome based on an Emory-CASS registry study. , 1989, American heart journal.

[13]  I. Palacios,et al.  Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as initial treatment strategies. , 1989, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  V. Parsonnet,et al.  Coronary angioplasty versus coronary bypass. Three-year follow-up of a matched series of 250 patients. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.

[16]  D. Holmes,et al.  Role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in multivessel disease. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  J. Divernois,et al.  Angiographic follow-up after multivessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  L. Klein,et al.  Medical and surgical survival in coronary artery disease in the 1980s. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Clinical and angiographic assessment 6 months after double vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  G. Vetrovec,et al.  Coronary angioplasty of multiple vessels: short-term outcome and long-term results. , 1985, Circulation.

[21]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Immediate and short-term benefit of multilesion coronary angioplasty: influence of degree of revascularization. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  L. Elveback,et al.  Follow-up clinical results in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1985, Circulation.

[23]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. , 1983, Circulation.

[24]  M. Kern,et al.  Predictors of long-term cardiac survival in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  U. Deligonul.  Coronary Morphologic andClinical Determinants ofProcedural OutcomeWith Angioplasty forMultivessel Coronary Disease Implications forPatient Selection , 1990 .

[26]  P. Daily.  Early and five-year results for coronary artery bypass grafting. A benchmark for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  E. Topol,et al.  Multiple vessel coronary angioplasty: classification, results, and patterns of restenosis in 494 consecutive patients. , 1987, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.