How do insects represent familiar terrain?

We argue here that ants and bees have a piecemeal representation of familiar terrain. These insects remember no more than what is needed to sustain the separate and parallel strategies that they employ when travelling between their nest and foraging sites. One major strategy is path integration. The insect keeps a running tally of its distance and direction from the nest and so can always return home. This global path integration is enhanced by long-term memories of significant sites that insects store in terms of the coordinates (direction and distance) of these sites relative to the nest. With these memories insects can plan routes that are steered by path integration to such sites. Quite distinct from global path integration are memories associated with familiar routes. Route memories include stored views of landmarks along the route with, in some cases, local vectors linked to them. Local vectors by encoding the direction and/or distance from one landmark to the next, or from one landmark to a goal, help an insect keep to a defined route. We review experiments showing that although local vectors can be recalled by recognising landmarks, the global path integration system is independent of landmark information and that landmarks do not have positional coordinates associated with them. The major function of route landmarks is thus procedural, telling an insect what action to perform next, rather than its location relative to the nest.

[1]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark maps for honeybees , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[3]  Zhang,et al.  Visually mediated odometry in honeybees , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  M. Lindauer Time-compensated sun orientation in bees. , 1960, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[5]  R. Wehner,et al.  Lateral optic flow does not influence distance estimation in the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  Memory use in insect visual navigation , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  R Wehner,et al.  Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Landmark memories are more robust when acquired at the nest site than en route: experiments in desert ants , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[9]  T. S. Collett,et al.  On the encoding of movement vectors by honeybees. Are distance and direction represented independently? , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  R. Menzel,et al.  Two spatial memories for honeybee navigation , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Esch,et al.  Distance estimation by foraging honeybees , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  S. N. Fry,et al.  Sequence learning by honeybees , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  L. Chittka,et al.  The significance of landmarks for path integration in homing honeybee foragers , 1995, Naturwissenschaften.

[14]  R. Wehner,et al.  Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  T. S. Collett,et al.  How desert ants cope with enforced detours on their way home , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  T. Collett,et al.  Calibration of vector navigation in desert ants , 1999, Current Biology.

[17]  Zhang,et al.  Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  T. Collett,et al.  Visual landmarks and route following in desert ants , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  M Collett,et al.  Do familiar landmarks reset the global path integration system of desert ants? , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  T. Seeley,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGY OF HONEYBEE COLONIES IN A TEMPERATE DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1982 .

[21]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  How do insects use path integration for their navigation? , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  K. Frisch The dance language and orientation of bees , 1967 .

[23]  T. Collett,et al.  Local and global vectors in desert ant navigation , 1998, Nature.