Prostate Cancer Information Available in Health-Care Provider Offices: An Analysis of Content, Readability, and Cultural Sensitivity

Prostate cancer (PrCA) is the most common cancer affecting men in the United States, and African American men have the highest incidence among men in the United States. Little is known about the PrCA-related educational materials being provided to patients in health-care settings. Content, readability, and cultural sensitivity of materials available in providers’ practices in South Carolina were examined. A total of 44 educational materials about PrCA and associated sexual dysfunction was collected from 16 general and specialty practices. The content of the materials was coded, and cultural sensitivity was assessed using the Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool. Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were used to assess readability. Communication with health-care providers (52.3%), side effects of PrCA treatment (40.9%), sexual dysfunction and its treatment (38.6%), and treatment options (34.1%) were frequently presented. All materials had acceptable cultural sensitivity scores; however, 2.3% and 15.9% of materials demonstrated unacceptable cultural sensitivity regarding format and visual messages, respectively. Readability of the materials varied. More than half of the materials were written above a high-school reading level. PrCA-related materials available in health-care practices may not meet patients’ needs regarding content, cultural sensitivity, and readability. A wide range of educational materials that address various aspects of PrCA, including treatment options and side effects, should be presented in plain language and be culturally sensitive.

[1]  F. Fullam,et al.  The Relationship of Patient–Provider Communication on Quality of Life among African-American and White Cancer Survivors , 2017, Journal of health communication.

[2]  Keon L. Gilbert,et al.  African American prostate cancer survivorship: Exploring the role of social support in quality of life after radical prostatectomy , 2017, Journal of psychosocial oncology.

[3]  I. Tsaur,et al.  Prostate Cancer on the Web—Expedient Tool for Patients’ Decision-Making? , 2015, Journal of Cancer Education.

[4]  A. Gavin,et al.  Ethnicity and the prostate cancer experience: a qualitative metasynthesis , 2016, Psycho-oncology.

[5]  B. Helfand,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Predictors of Sexual Dysfunction in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer , 2015, Sexual medicine.

[6]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Treatment decisional regret among men with prostate cancer: Racial differences and influential factors in the North Carolina Health Access and Prostate Cancer Treatment Project (HCaP‐NC) , 2015, Cancer.

[7]  L. Fagerström,et al.  Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Caring for Patients Suffering from Self-Harm , 2014, Nursing research and practice.

[8]  A. D'Amico,et al.  The association between race and treatment regret among men with recurrent prostate cancer , 2014, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease.

[9]  Daniela B Friedman,et al.  How are we communicating about clinical trials?: an assessment of the content and readability of recruitment resources. , 2014, Contemporary clinical trials.

[10]  Donna L Berry,et al.  Evaluating the Linguistic Appropriateness and Cultural Sensitivity of a Self-Report System for Spanish-Speaking Patients with Cancer , 2014, Nursing research and practice.

[11]  J. Eloy,et al.  Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[12]  Chandy S Ellimoottil,et al.  Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[13]  R. Alston,et al.  Understanding preventive behaviors among mid-Western African-American men: a pilot qualitative study of prostate screening. , 2011, Journal of men's health.

[14]  S. Laditka,et al.  Cognitive Health Messages in Popular Women’s and Men’s Magazines, 2006-2007 , 2010, Preventing chronic disease.

[15]  D. Friedman,et al.  A Comprehensive Assessment of the Difficulty Level and Cultural Sensitivity of Online Cancer Prevention Resources for Older Minority Men , 2007, Preventing chronic disease.

[16]  L Hoffman-Goetz,et al.  Readability and cultural sensitivity of web-based patient decision aids for cancer screening and treatment: A systematic review , 2007, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[17]  Daniela B. Friedman,et al.  A Systematic Review of Readability and Comprehension Instruments Used for Print and Web-Based Cancer Information , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[18]  D. Friedman,et al.  Assessment of Cultural Sensitivity of Cancer Information in Ethnic Print Media , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[19]  M. Litwin,et al.  Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  E. Klein,et al.  Sexuality and Health-Related Quality of Life After Prostate Cancer in African-American and White Men Treated for Localized Disease , 2004, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[21]  J. Guidry,et al.  Assessing cultural sensitivity in printed cancer materials. , 1999, Cancer practice.

[22]  P. Fagan,et al.  Cultural sensitivity and readability of breast and prostate printed cancer education materials targeting African Americans. , 1998, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[23]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[24]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[26]  G. Chornokur,et al.  The Prostate 71 : 985 ^ 997 ( 2011 ) Disparities at Presentation , Diagnosis , Treatment , and SurvivalinAfricanAmericanMen , Affectedby ProstateCancer , 2011 .

[27]  R. Bailey,et al.  Prostate Cancer in African American Males: Psychological Effects of Diagnosis and Prostatectomy , 2009 .

[28]  G. Harry McLaughlin,et al.  SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula. , 1969 .

[29]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 2022 .