Registration Method for the Detection of Tumors in Lung and Liver Using Multimodal Small Animal Imaging

Small animal PET scanning with 18F-FDG has been increasingly used in the studies using murine tumor models. The aim of this study was to obtain multimodal tumor images with the use of small animal PET and clinical CT by using hardware guidance and a registration method. PET imaging studies were performed with a dedicated small animal PET scanner. Static PET images of mice with liver and lung tumors were scanned for 20 minute by the use of hardware guidance with 1% activity of the injected dose. The CT images obtained with the use of a clinical CT scanner can be used to improve the anatomical localization of uptake in PET images. 124I -FIAU-PET was obtained from mice containing an orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Contrast enhanced CT images were obtained at three hours after injection of contrast agent. The PET and CT images were fused using hardware fiducial markers that were manually identified in both data sets. The PET and CT images were precisely registered by the use of a small animal contour point in both data sets to perform a point-based rigid registration. The registered images in the HCC model and a lung metastatic tumor model showed good agreement of tumor region on the both PET and CT images. The use of PET and contrast enhanced CT allowed a precise and improved detection of tumors in liver and lung models. Multimodal imaging with small animal PET and clinical CT images was useful in the detection of metastatic tumors and this multimodal imaging registration method can improve the quantitative accuracy and interpretation of tracer.

[1]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Keh-Shih Chuang,et al.  A three-dimensional registration method for automated fusion of micro PET-CT-SPECT whole-body images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Walter G. Gunn Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[5]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  B. Dawant,et al.  Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy. , 2004, Medical physics.

[8]  T. Jones,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) methodology for small animals and its application in radiopharmaceutical preclinical investigation. , 1998, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[9]  G. Cheon,et al.  Anesthesia condition for 18F-FDG imaging of lung metastasis tumors using small animal PET , 2008 .

[10]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  Sanjiv S. Gambhir,et al.  AMIDE: A Free Software Tool for Multimodality Medical Image Analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  How should we analyse FDG PET studies for monitoring tumour response? , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  R. N. Goble,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  D. Weber,et al.  Ultra-high-resolution imaging of small animals: Implications for preclinical and research studies , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  M E Easterly,et al.  A review of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography and other imaging modalities for small animal research. , 2001, Lab animal.

[16]  S. Larson,et al.  The Progress and Promise of Molecular Imaging Probes in Oncologic Drug Development , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  Simone Weber,et al.  Small animal PET: aspects of performance assessment , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  M J Paulus,et al.  High resolution X-ray computed tomography: an emerging tool for small animal cancer research. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[19]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  3D multimodality medical image registration using morphological tools , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Molecular imaging of small animals with dedicated PET tomographs , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.